To determine the relationship between insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function, we quantified the insulin sensitivity index using the minimal model in 93 relatively young, apparently healthy human subjects of varying degrees of obesity (55 male, 38 female; 18-44 yr of age; body mass index 19.5-52.2 kg/m2) and with fasting glucose levels < 6.4 mM. SI was compared with measures of body adiposity and beta-cell function. Although lean individuals showed a wide range of SI, body mass index and SI were related in a curvilinear manner (P < 0.0001) so that on average, an increase in body mass index was associated generally with a lower value for SI. The relationship between the SI and the beta-cell measures was more clearly curvilinear and reciprocal for fasting insulin (P < 0.0001), first-phase insulin response (AIRglucose; P < 0.0001), glucose potentiation slope (n = 56; P < 0.005), and beta-cell secretory capacity (AIRmax; n = 43; P < 0.0001). The curvilinear relationship between SI and the beta-cell measures could not be distinguished from a hyperbola, i.e., SI x beta-cell function = constant. This hyperbolic relationship described the data significantly better than a linear function (P < 0.05). The nature of this relationship is consistent with a regulated feedback loop control system such that for any difference in SI, a proportionate reciprocal difference occurs in insulin levels and responses in subjects with similar carbohydrate tolerance. We conclude that in human subjects with normal glucose tolerance and varying degrees of obesity, beta-cell function varies quantitatively with differences in insulin sensitivity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

OBJECTIVE: Insulin glargine (21A-Gly-30Ba-L-Arg-30Bb-L-Arg-human insulin) is a biosynthetic insulin analog with a prolonged duration of action compared with NPH human insulin. This study compared insulin glargine with NPH human insulin in subjects with type 1 diabetes who had been previously treated with multiple daily injections of NPH insulin and regular insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was a multicenter randomized parallel-group study in which subjects were randomized to receive premeal regular insulin and either insulin glargine (at bedtime) or NPH insulin (at bedtime for patients on once-daily therapy and at bedtime and in the morning for patients on twice-daily therapy) for up to 28 weeks. Dose titration of both basal insulins was based on capillary fasting whole blood glucose (FBG) levels; the goal was a premeal blood glucose concentration of 4.4-6.7 mmol/l. RESULTS: A total of 534 well-controlled type 1 diabetic subjects (mean GHb 7.7%, mean fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 11.8 mmo/l) were treated. A small decrease in GHb levels was noted with both insulin glargine (-0.16%) and NPH insulin (-0.21%; P &gt; 0.05). Significant reductions in median FPG levels from baseline (-1.67 vs. -0.33 mmol/l with NPH insulin, P = 0.0145) and a trend for a reduction in capillary FBG levels were achieved with insulin glargine. After the 1-month titration phase, significantly fewer subjects receiving insulin glargine experienced symptomatic hypoglycemia (39.9 vs. 49.2%, P = 0.0219) or nocturnal hypoglycemia (18.2 vs. 27.1%, P = 0.0116) with a blood glucose level &lt;2.0 mmol/l compared with subjects receiving NPH insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Lower FPG levels with fewer episodes of hypoglycemia were achieved with insulin glargine compared with once- or twice-daily NPH insulin as part of a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes.

No abstract

Summary. First-degree relatives of Type i (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients are at increased risk for developing clinical diabetes. The presence of islet cell or insulin autoantibodies further identifies relatives at greater risk, but not all immunologic-marker-positive relatives progress to disease. Beta-cell dysfunction, however, seems to be more prevalent than clinical Type 1 diabetes, since stable subclinical pancreatic Beta-cell dysfunction may occur. Antibodies against a Mr 64,000 (64K) islet Beta-cell protein, identified as glutamic acid decarboxylase, have been reported both at and several years prior to the clinical onset of Type i diabetes. We measured 64K antibodies in first-degree relatives with varying degrees of Beta-cell dysfunction and risk for subsequent Type i diabetes to determine whether 64K antibodies improve the predictive power of islet cell antibodies and/or insulin autoantibodies. In the Seattle Family Study first-degree relatives of Type 1 diabetic patients are followed prospectively using detailed Beta-cell function tests, insulin sensitivity, quantitative evaluation of islet cell antibodies and fluid phase assay insulin autoantibodies. 64K antibodies were measured using dog islets. Relatives were selected, based on Beta-cell function to represent individuals at high (n = 6) and low (n = 30) risk for subsequent Type 1 diabetes. The 30 low-risk individuals followed-up for 78 months, had stable Beta-cell function, and six (20%) were negative for all autoantibodies, ten (33%) were positive for insulin autoantibodies, 16 (53%) were islet cell antibody positive While six (20%) were positive for 64K antibodies. In contrast, of the six subjects with progressively declining Beta-cell function who are therefore at high risk, two of whom have already developed Type i diabetes, two (33%) were positive for insulin autoantibodies, four (67%) were islet cell antibody positive, while all six (100%) were positive for 64K antibodies. We conclude that antibodies to the Mr 64,000 islet protein correlate with progressive Beta-cell dysfunction more closely than either islet cell antibodies or insulin autoantibodies, but can sometimes be present in individuals whose Beta-cell function remains stable over several years.