No abstract

This is a Library Circulating Copy which may be borrowed for two weeks.

2 3Analysis of integral bridge structures shows that lateral earth pressures on the end abutments have a dominant influence on the sizing of bridge components. Thermal cyclic movements induced by deck expansion cause densification of backfill material, leading to the build-up of high pressures behind the abutments. Measures to reduce these pressures by the use of alternative backfill materials can be highly beneficial to the structure as a whole, with extra expenditure on the backfill material being offset, and in some cases exceeded, by savings in material quantities in the rest of the structure and build time. This paper examines three contrasting backfill options that were considered during the design of Cottington Road overbridge in Kent: 6N granular backfill; lightweight expanded clay; and expanded polystyrene blocks. Although more expensive as a material than the other options investigated, the expanded polystyrene block option was selected as the most economical solution for this particular structure owing to large material savings in the foundations, abutment walls and wing walls as a direct result of reduced lateral pressures. Although it did not form part of the decision-making process, this paper also shows a significant saving in embodied and transport-related carbon dioxide emissions through preferring expanded polystyrene blocks to expanded clay.

New and refurbished non-domestic buildings are failing to live up to their anticipated performance. Shortfalls show in excess energy consumption, high carbon dioxide emissions and other failings in quantitative and qualitative performance metrics. This paper describes the component parts of the performance gap using evidence from building performance evaluations. It introduces a way of visualising the consequences of decisions and actions that are known to compromise performance outcomes using a performance curve methodology (the S-curve) which plots performance, and the root causes of underperformance, from project inception to initial operation and beyond. The paper tests the hypothesis with two case studies. It also covers the initial development of a prototype visualisation tool designed to enable live projects to track emerging operational energy and emissions against a high energy and emissions trajectory created from empirical evidence. The tool aims to help practitioners identify key risk factors that could compromise building performance and mitigate these risks at different stages of procurement. Practical application: The Operational Energy and Carbon (OpEC) visualisation tool is designed for wide industrial application, on all sizes of a non-domestic building project, large and small. It aims to visualise the likely outturn energy performance of a project by calculating the penalties for shortcomings in project delivery. The penalties are visualised as weighted trajectories of energy and carbon dioxide emissions. The prototype tool aims to fill a gap between the capabilities of powerful energy modelling tools used in design and the capacity of non-specialist stakeholders to understand the emerging energy characteristics of a project as it moves through procurement, design, construction, and delivery.