Although normal isotropic hummocky cross‐stratification is commonly interpreted to be the deposit of large‐scale ripples, there are many reasons why this may not usually be the case. These reasons include: (i) that the stratification produced by large‐scale ripples does not particularly look like isotropic hummocky cross‐stratification; (ii) that it is difficult reconciling the abundance of HCS with the restricted hydraulic stability of large‐scale ripples in silt to fine sand (i.e. the grain sizes in which hummocky cross‐stratification is usually found); (iii) that the distribution of hummocky cross‐stratification within ancient storm beds is not the distribution that would be expected from large‐scale ripples; (iv) that the flows calculated to have formed ancient examples of hummocky cross‐stratification would be expected to generate an upper stage plane bed rather than ripples; and (v) that it is difficult to explain why large‐scale ripples would predominate in the proximal parts of storm beds when modern storm flows commonly exceed the threshold for entrainment. In contrast to the various hypotheses which propose that isotropic hummocky cross‐stratification is generated by ripples, an alternative hypothesis which suggests that it is generated by instabilities, does seem to adequately explain the origin of hummocky cross‐stratification. However, it is difficult to accept this hypothesis given that the origin of the proposed instabilities is unproven. These conclusions highlight the continued uncertainty regarding the process, which generates hummocky cross‐stratification.

No abstract

The relatively fine-grained Late Devonian to Early Carboniferous 'Cork Beds' succession of the South Munster Basin includes continuous sections of paralic facies that are over 1000 m thick and individual sandstone units over 300 m thick. However, the succession does not reflect prolonged phases when facies belts were stationary, but rather multiple stacking of small-scale, highfrequency sequences, each associated with pronounced migration of shorelines. What seems to have been unusual about the South Munster Basin succession was that the geographical positioning of these high-frequency sequences was fixed. This resulted from an unusual combination of tectonics, shelf hydrodynamics, sedimentation rates and the textural maturity of the sediment within the basin. Of these, tectonics was probably most critical, particularly the juxtaposition of rapid subsidence in basinal areas and a basin margin zone (to the north) that was sufficiently up-standing to pin the maximum extent of transgression during repeated highstands of sea-level, yet not so upstanding as to have diverted the major regional drainage system. The embayed palaeogeography of the area may also have been influential.

Since production began in the HP/HT Kristin Field off mid-Norway, reservoir pressure in each of the three mid to late Jurassic reservoir units (the Garn, Ile and Tofte formations) has declined significantly more rapidly than was initially predicted. In the Garn Formation, the Tofte Formation and to some extent also the Ile Formation, this has occurred at least partly because an unusual distribution of reservoir properties led to bias in the four-well appraisal dataset and this in turn resulted in an overestimation of reservoir properties. Of particular importance to this bias was the fact that very good but unrepresentative reservoir properties were encountered in all three reservoir zones in the discovery well located in the centre of the field. These, it is now realized, are not even typical of most of the central part of the field but are, instead, restricted within one, small, anomalous area. Study of cores and thin sections indicates that in each reservoir unit this directly reflects a concentration of more energetic depositional facies in the area while less energetic facies are present on three sides. This pattern was not predictable from the original dataset and seems to have arisen because there was structural control upon facies positioning during accumulation of the reservoir section. This influenced the distribution of cleaner, coarser grained, more proximal depositional facies and, ultimately, reservoir quality distribution and pressure development. What is interesting about Kristin Field is that the structural influence upon sedimentation is observed within the footwall stratigraphy of a major relay structure where the primary provenance direction was on the hanging-wall side. This pattern is the reverse of what is normally reported in tectono-stratigraphic studies.

No abstract