Background: The kidney allograft biopsy is considered the gold standard for rejection diagnosis but is invasive and could be indeterminate. Several publications point to the role of miRNA expression in suggesting its involvement in the acceptance or rejection of organ transplantation. This study aimed to analyze microRNAs involved in the differentiation and activation of B and T lymphocytes from kidney transplant (KT) patients’ peripheral blood leukocytes to be used as biomarkers of acute renal rejection (AR). Methods: A total of 15 KT patients with and without acute rejection (AR/NAR) were analyzed and quantified by miRNA PCR array. A total of 84 miRNAs related to lymphocyte differentiation and activation B and T were studied. The functions and biological pathways were analyzed to predict the potential targets of differential expressed miRNAs. Results: Six miRNA were increased in the AR group (miR-191-5p, miR-223-3p, miR-346, miR-423-5p, miR-574-3p, and miR-181d) and miR-150-5p was increased in the NAR group. In silico studies showed a total of 2603 target genes for the increased miRNAs in AR, while for the decrease miRNA, a total of 1107 target-potential genes were found. Conclusions: Our results show that KT with AR shows a decrease in miR-150-5p expression compared to NAR, suggesting that the decrease in miR-150-5p could be related to an increased MBD6 whose deregulation could have clinical consequences.

In kidney transplantation, a biopsy is currently the gold standard for monitoring the transplanted organ. However, this is far from an ideal screening method given its invasive nature and the discomfort it can cause the patient. Large-scale studies in renal transplantation show that approximately 1% of biopsies generate major complications, with a risk of macroscopic hematuria greater than 3.5%. It would not be until 2011 that a method to detect donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) employing digital PCR was devised based on analyzing the differences in SNPs between the donor and recipient. In addition, since the initial validation studies were carried out at the specific moments in which rejection was suspected, there is still not a good understanding of how dd-cfDNA levels naturally evolve post-transplant. In addition, various factors, both in the recipient and the donor, can influence dd-cfDNA levels and cause increases in the levels of dd-cfDNA themselves without suspicion of rejection. All that glitters in this technology is not gold; therefore, in this article, we discuss the current state of clinical studies, the benefits, and disadvantages.

No abstract