Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG) is a fatal brain cancer that arises in the brainstem of children with no effective treatment and near 100% fatality. The failure of most therapies can be attributed to the delicate location of these tumors and choosing therapies based on assumptions that DIPGs are molecularly similar to adult disease. Recent studies have unraveled the unique genetic make-up of this brain cancer with nearly 80% harboring a K27M-H3.3 or K27M-H3.1 mutation. However, DIPGs are still thought of as one disease with limited understanding of the genetic drivers of these tumors. To understand what drives DIPGs we integrated whole-genome-sequencing with methylation, expression and copy-number profiling, discovering that DIPGs are three molecularly distinct subgroups (H3-K27M, Silent, MYCN) and uncovering a novel recurrent activating mutation in the activin receptor ACVR1, in 20% of DIPGs. Mutations in ACVR1 were constitutively activating, leading to SMAD phosphorylation and increased expression of downstream activin signaling targets ID1 and ID2. Our results highlight distinct molecular subgroups and novel therapeutic targets for this incurable pediatric cancer.

After completing this course, the reader will be able to:1. Discuss the basic epidemiology of pediatric CNS GCTs.2. Perform the diagnostic workup and full evaluation that is necessary when evaluating a patient with a suspected CNS GCT.3. Select among the different therapeutic alternatives employed in treating children with a CNS GCT.This article is available for continuing medical education credit at CME.TheOncologist.com. CME CME ABSTRACTCentral nervous system (CNS) germ cell tumors (GCTs) represent approximately 3% of primary pediatric brain tumors and encompass a wide pathologic spectrum. CNS GCTs are most commonly located in the pineal and suprasellar regions of the brain and can be divided into major groups including germinomas and nongerminomatous GCTs (NGGCTs), with teratomas often considered a separate category. The clinical presentation varies by location and size, and it frequently includes endocrine abnormalities, visual changes, and signs of increased intracranial pressure. Neuroimaging studies cannot differentiate GCTs from other tumors, and therefore, the diagnosis usually requires histologic confirmation. The rare exceptions are the cases where characteristic elevations of tumor markers, including alphafetoprotein and/or ␤-human chorionic gonadotropin are documented in the serum and/or cerebrospinal fluid. In these cases, the imaging findings along with the tumor marker elevation may be diagnostic in themselves without the need for tissue confirmation. Treatment and prognosis differ greatly between groups. Germinomas have a superior prognosis than NGGCTs. Five-year overall survival rates >90% were reported initially with the use of craniospinal irradiation. More recently, the use of chemotherapy in addition to radiation therapy has afforded the ability to decrease the dose and volume of radiation therapy without affecting survival rates. NGGCTs are less radiosensitive than germinomas, but the use of adjuvant chemotherapy has improved survival rates in this group as well. The standard management for CNS GCTs remains controversial. Treatment regimens aimed to improve progression-free and overall survival times are ongoing. The Oncologist

Authors' Contributions 1.JF -Substantial contributions to acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the work, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 2.AO -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, analysis and interpretation of data, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 3.TP -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 4.SW -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, analysis and interpretation of data, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 5.AL -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 6.NL -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 7.AB -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 8.RP -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 9.LK -Substantial revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 10.SG -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 11.IP -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 12.IQ -Substantial contributions to revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 13.RJ -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable ...

SUMMARY We recently reported that atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRTs) comprise at least two transcriptional subtypes with different clinical outcomes; however, the mechanisms underlying therapeutic heterogeneity remained unclear. In this study, we analyzed 191 primary ATRTs and 10 ATRT cell lines to define the genomic and epigenomic landscape of ATRTs and identify subgroup-specific therapeutic targets. We found ATRTs segregated into three epigenetic subgroups with distinct genomic profiles, SMARCB1 genotypes, and chromatin landscape that correlated with differential cellular responses to a panel of signaling and epigenetic inhibitors. Significantly, we discovered that differential methylation of a PDGFRB-associated enhancer confers specific sensitivity of group 2 ATRT cells to dasatinib and nilotinib, and suggest that these are promising therapies for this highly lethal ATRT subtype.