Introduction: Mucosal melanoma is rare and associated with poorer prognosis in comparison to conventional melanoma subtypes. Little is known about the prognostic significance as well as possible associations between PARP1 and immunologic response in mucosal melanoma. Methods: PARP1, PD-L1 and IDO1 immunostains were performed on 192 mucosal melanomas including 86 vulvar, 89 sinonasal, and 17 anorectal melanomas. Results: By Kaplan–Meier analyses, high PARP1 expression correlated with worse overall and melanoma-specific survival (log-rank p values = 0.026 and 0.047, respectively). Tumors with combined PARP1 and IDO1 high expression correlated with worse overall and melanoma-specific survival (p = 0.015, 0.0034 respectively). By multivariate analyses, high PARP1 expression remained a predictor of worse survival independent of stage. By Fisher’s exact test, high PARP1 expression correlated with highly mitogenic tumors (p = 0.02). High tumoral PD-L1 and IDO1 expression were associated with ulcerated primary tumors (p = 0.019, 0.0019, respectively). By linear regression analyses, correlations between PARP1 expression versus IDO1 expression (p = 0.0001) and mitotic index (p = 0.0052) were observed. Conclusion: Increased expression of PARP1 is an independent negative prognostic marker in mucosal melanomas. The association between PARP1 and IDO1 and their combined adverse prognostic role raise the potential of combined therapy in mucosal melanoma.
Sinonasal melanomas encompass melanoma arising in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Despite recent advances in tumor genomics, correlation between mutational status and protein expression with prognosis and tumor pigmentation has not been carried out in sinonasal melanomas. Ninety-five sinonasal melanomas from 95 patients were included. As per univariate analyses, age was the only variable that significantly correlated with progression-free survival. SF3B1, NRAS, KIT, and BRAF mutations were documented in 7% (5/72), 22% (16/72), 22% (16/72), and 8% (6/72) of cases, respectively. Comutation was detected in 6 cases: NRAS and KIT in 2 cases; NRAS and BRAF in 2 cases; SF3B1, KIT, and BRAF in one case; and SF3B1, NRAS, and KIT in one case. Correlations approaching statistical significance were observed between BRAF mutation status and poorer overall survival and progression-free survival (log-rank P-values=0.054 and 0.061). Increased CD117 expression (33%, 29/88) and decreased nuclear cMYC expression (40%, 39/84) significantly correlated with cytoplasmic pigmentation. Several SF3B1, NRAS, and KIT mutations not previously documented in sinonasal melanomas were detected in our series, suggesting a potential role for targeted therapies. A similar frequency of SF3B1, NRAS, and KIT mutations was noted in Asian cases, whereas NRAS, KIT, and BRAF mutations were predominant in the United States and European cases; however, the number of included cases was small. The significant association between CD117 and cMYC expression with increased cytoplasmic pigmentation in our series suggests that the pigmented morphologic appearance of sinonasal melanomas could be attributed to the underlying oncogenic mutations and metabolic interaction.
Endolymphatic sac tumor (ELST) is a rare neoplasm arising in the temporal petrous region thought to originate from endolymphatic sac epithelium. It may arise sporadically or in association with Von-Hippel-Lindau syndrome (VHL). The ELST prevalence in VHL ranges from 3 to 16% and may be the initial presentation of the disease. Onset is usually in the 3rd to 5th decade with hearing loss and an indolent course. ELSTs present as locally destructive lesions with characteristic computed tomography imaging features. Histologically, they show papillary, cystic or glandular architectures. Immunohistochemically, they express keratin, EMA, and variably S100 and GFAP. Currently it is recommended that, given its rarity, ELST needs to be differentiated from other entities with similar morphologic patterns, particularly other VHL-associated neoplasms such as metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Nineteen ELST cases were studied. Immunohistochemistry (18/19) and single nucleotide polymorphism microarray testing was performed (12/19). Comparison with the immunophenotype and copy number profile in RCC is discussed. Patients presented with characteristic bone destructive lesions in the petrous temporal bones. Pathology of tumors showed characteristic ELST morphology with immunoexpression of CK7, GFAP, S100, PAX-8, PAX-2, CA-9 in the tumor cells. Immunostaines for RCC, CD10, CK20, chromogranin A, synaptophysin, TTF-1, thyroglobulin, and transthyretin were negative in the tumor cells. Molecular testing showed loss of 3p and 9q in 66% (8/12) and 58% (7/12) cases, respectively. Immunoreactivity for renal markers in ELST is an important diagnostic caveat and has not been previously reported. In fact, renal markers are currently recommended in order to rule out metastatic RCC although PAX gene complex and CA-9 have been implicated in the development of the inner ear. Importantly copy number assessment of ELST has not been previously reported. Loss of 3p (including the VHL locus) in ELST suggests similar mechanistic origins as ccRCC.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s40478-018-0607-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.