No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Intel, Fort Collins, COThe 700mm 2 65nm Itanium ® processor codenamed Tukwila [1] integrates four cores and a system interface with six QuickPath ® interconnect channels and four memory interconnect channels. The large die, shown in Fig. 3.4.6, and high level of integration coupled with process variability present clock-system design challenges in the areas of power consumption and variability compensation that we discuss in this paper. Figure 3.4.1 shows the clock system, which is a cascaded-PLL architecture with an initial filter PLL that receives a 133MHz reference clock. This maiden PLL filters reference-clock jitter and outputs a 133MHz clock to 13 downstream PLLs. Each downstream PLL has a duty-cycle corrector that monitors and corrects the end-of-route duty cycle.The post-PLL clock distributions for the core, system interface, and memory/processor interconnect digital-logic domains follow a common architecture. A balanced-H-tree clock route provides a full-swing clock to the secondlevel clock buffers (SLCBs), which are regional buffers with adjustable delay and static duty-cycle adjustment. Regional active deskew (RAD) detects possible phase misalignment between SLCBs and adjusts the SLCB delay to correct this phase error. The clock vernier device (CVD) is a local buffer with scan-controlled delay for fine-grained performance and debug tuning. Finally, the gater creates a variety of clock waveforms for use by latches and can be disabled to save power [1,2].The CPU power microcontroller and memory/processor interconnect transmit-clock domains differ in their distribution. In the QuickPath-and memoryinterconnect links, a shallow clock distribution follows the interconnect PLL, delivering a clock to the transmit logic with minimal jitter. A mux prior to the memory interconnect PLLs allows selection of an external clock reference. The CPU power microcontroller uses the system interface PLL output, which is divided down to a lower frequency. The microcontroller uses a single SLCB, so no RAD system is necessary in its clock domain.Each PLL achieves a wide frequency range over the process space by implementing a self-biased architecture [3] followed by a programmable output divider. Self-biased PLL jitter is minimized when the VCO power and signal swing are maximized, corresponding to a maximum VCO control voltage. This means the VCO should operate near its maximum frequency limit (F MAX ) [4]. Because the desired PLL output frequency is often much lower than the VCO F MAX , the divider is used to optimize the VCO frequency. In manufacturing, each PLL is calibrated by forcing the VCO control voltage from an on-die DAC and reading an on-die frequency counter. Fuses then select the optimal divisor (1, 2 or 4) for each clock ratio, N, assuring that the VCO will be running as close to its F MAX as possible. Figure 3.4.2a shows a calibrated VCO and associated divide settings across ratios. Figure 3.4.2b shows measured accumulated jitter curves from a part. The plateau jitter of the PLL improves from 20 to 6ps when inc...

No abstract