In a pear tree orchard planted on loam soil, each plot was treated in April 1998 with either one of the ureas diuron or chlorotoluron, or triazine simazine herbicides applied at 3, 4, and 2 kg AI ha(-1), respectively. Some plots had not been previously treated with one of these herbicides. Other plots had been treated annually during the past 12 years with the same herbicide. One herbicide, and always the same, was thus applied to each plot. In the plots treated for the first time with either diuron, chlorotoluron, or simazine, the soil half-lives of these herbicides in the 0-10 cm surface soil layer were 81, 64, and 59 days, respectively. In the plots treated with the same herbicide for 12 years, the corresponding soil half-lives were 37, 11, and 46 days. Diuron thus produced a moderately enhanced biodegradation, chlorotoluron a high one, and simazine a low but significant one. In another pear tree orchard planted on sandy loam soil, each plot was treated in April 1998 with one of the amide propyzamide (1.25 or 1.0 AI kg ha(-1)) or diflufenican (250 g AI ha(-1)) herbicides. In the plots not previously treated with propyzamide, the propyzamide soil half-life was the same for both doses, i.e., about 30 days. In the plots treated annually for 3 or 14 years with propyzamide, the soil half-life was 12 and 10 days, respectively. In the plots treated for the first time with diflufenican and in those treated annually with diflufenican for 3 years, the diflufenican soil half-life was the same, i.e., 65 days. Propyzamide thus already showed a highly accelerated biodegradation after 3 years of repeated annual applications. Diflufenican, however, did not show enhanced biodegradation after 3 years of repeated annual applications.
