Pain and sedation management for patients undergoing burn dressing change can be challenging. Variations appear to exist in the selection of medications before and during burn dressing change. To determine if institutional variations exist in pain and sedation management for burn dressing change, an online survey was sent to ABA Burn Center nurses and physicians. Three hundred seventy-eight anonymous responses were received from nurses (72%), nurse practitioners (10%), and physicians (18%). Burn centers had adult (22%), pediatric (12%), or pediatric and adult (66%) patients. Eighty percentage of centers had >200 patients/year. Sixty-eight percentage always used a premedication. Oxycodone and morphine or fentanyl was the most frequently used per oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) opioid premedication, respectively. The most common IV premedication anxiolytic were benzodiazepines. Sixty-eight percentage always used a long-acting opioid. Anesthetic regimen was decided case-by-case (47%) or specific protocol (24%). Protocol was followed always (18%) or mostly (55%). Patients' procedural pain could be better controlled 20% of the time. Pain regimen was altered most of the time (25%). Providers differed rarely (39%) and sometimes (44%) regarding preferred regimen. Ketamine was the most common deep sedative. A dedicated anesthesiologist was rarely (33%) consulted, determined case-by-case (33%) or prior failure/excess pain (19%). Acute pain service was never (51%) or rarely (35%) consulted. Pain and sedation management for burn dressing change is difficult and variations in approach exist among burn centers. Such management needs individualized care. Providers must be responsive to pain alterations. Consultation with anesthesia providers may be needed in specific cases. Further studies need to be completed to demonstrate the most effective means of controlling burn pain and evaluating patient outcomes.

Background: Disparities encountered by men and women physicians are well documented. However, evidence is lacking concerning the effects of gender on daily practice in the specialty of anesthesiology. Aims: To evaluate gender disparities perceived by female anesthesiologists. Setting and Design: Anonymous, voluntary 30-question, electronic secure REDcap survey. Materials and Methods: Survey link was sent via email, Twitter and the Facebook page, Physician Mom's Group. Instructions dictated that only female attending anesthesiologists participate and to partake in the survey one time. Statistical Analysis: Categorical variables were summarized using frequencies and percentages. Associations between categorical variables were tested using Chi-square test. Likert scale items were treated as continuous variables. T-tests were utilized to examine differences between those who reported burnout and those who did not. Results: 502 survey responses were received and analyzed. Female leadership was valued by 78%, yet only 47% had leadership roles. Being female was identified by 51% as negatively affecting career advancement and 90% perceived that women in medicine need to work harder than men to achieve the same career goals. Sexual harassment was experienced by 55%. Nearly 35% of institutions did not offer paid maternity leave. Burnout was identified in 43% of respondents and was significantly associated with work-life balance not being ideal ( P < 0.0001), gender negatively affecting career advancement ( P < 0.0001), experiencing sexual harassment at work ( P = 0.002), feeling the need to work harder than men ( P = 0.0033), being responsible for majority of household duties ( P = 0.0074), lack of weekly exercise ( P = 0.0135) and lack of lactation needs at work ( P = 0.0007). Conclusions: Understanding perceptions of female anesthesiologists may lead to actionable plans aimed at improving workplace equity or conditions.

The management of pain and sedation during burn dressing change is challenging. Previous reviews and studies have identified wide variability in such practices in hospitalized burn patients. This survey-based study aimed to determine the most commonly utilized sedation and analgesia practices in adult burn patients treated in the outpatient setting. The goal was to identify opportunities for improvement and to assist burn centers in optimizing sedation procedures. A 23-question survey was sent to members of the American Burn Association. Nonpharmacological interventions including music, television, games, and virtual reality were used by 68% of survey respondents. Eighty-one percent reported premedicating with oral opioids, 32% with intravenous opioids, and 45% with anxiolytics. Fifty-nine percentage of respondents indicated that the initial medication regimen for outpatient dressing changes consisted of the patient's existing oral pain medications. Forty-three percent indicated that there were no additional options if this regimen provided inadequate analgesia. Fifty-six percentage of respondents felt that pain during dressing change was adequately controlled 75% to 100% of the time, and 32% felt it was adequately controlled 50% to 75% of the time. Nitrous oxide was used by 8%. Anesthesia providers and an acute pain service are available in a minority of cases (13.7% and 28%, respectively) and are rarely consulted. Procedural burn pain remains significantly undertreated in the outpatient setting and the approach to treatment is variable among burn centers in the United States. Such variation likely represents an opportunity for identifying and implementing optimal practices and developing guidelines for burn pain management in the outpatient setting.

Introduction Objective: Identify prevalence and factors associated with hypoxia and blood pressure changes during MAC anesthesia for inpatient burn dressing change. Methods Retrospective chart review on 112 adult inpatients undergoing 1 or more burn dressing changes under MAC from March 2014 to December 2017 at a single burn center. Results Study population was 112 burn inpatients undergoing 210 burn dressing changes under MAC. Median age was 43 years (range 18–93) with 78% male and 95% Caucasian. Average BMI was 29.7 (range 18–66). Average % total body surface area (TBSA) burn was 24% (range 1%-70%). Number of MAC dressing changes per patient was 1 to 16 with most (71.4%) undergoing 1 MAC dressing change. Among 210 MAC cases, 5 involved a hypoxemic event (defined as a % O2 saturation of &lt; 90%) and 14 involved a blood pressure changed (defined as a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of &lt; 60 mmHg) on 7 different patients Three of the hypoxic events were also associated with hypotension (1.4%) None of these events were associated with poor outcomes. Conclusions MAC anesthesia for dressing changes are performed on inpatients during all stages of the burn recovery. Anesthesia is involved with the initial dressing changes on the critical care individuals. The MAC anesthesia is titrated to the condition of the patient with very low frequency of hypoxia or severe hypotension. Applicability of Research to Practice Burn dressing changes are challenging anesthesias because of the often associated co-morbidities of the presenting patients. Other factors that are considered are the NPO status and nutritional requirements of the patients. The desire to accomplish the dressing changes with the least amount of disruption of this while caring for these ill patients can be safely accomplished with MAC dressing changes. This provides an incredibly safe environment for the patient with the rapidly titratable medications that allow the dressing changes to be completed efficiently.

No abstract