No abstract

No abstract

Developmental and reproductive toxicology testing in nonhuman primates (NHPs) has become more common due to the increasing number of biopharmaceuticals in drug development, since NHPs are frequently the only species to express pharmacologic responses similar to humans. NHPs may also be used to help resolve issues associated with small-molecule reproductive toxicology in traditional species (rodents and rabbits). Adequate designs in NHP are presented for developmental toxicity (embryo-fetal development, pre-postnatal development, enhanced pre-postnatal development), reproductive toxicity (male and female), and juvenile toxicity studies. Optional parameters that may be included in these studies are discussed, as are new study designs that consolidate multiple aspects of the reproductive assessment and thereby conserve the limited supply of sexually mature NHPs available for testing. The details described will assist scientists in pharmaceutical, regulatory, and contract research organizations who are involved in conducting these unique studies to optimize their design based on case-by-case considerations.

No abstract

Although toxicology studies should always be conducted in pharmacologically relevant species, the specificity of many biopharmaceuticals can present challenges in identification of a relevant species. In certain cases, that is, when the clinical product is active only in humans or chimpanzees, or if the clinical candidate is active in other species but immunogenicity limits the ability to conduct a thorough safety assessment, alternative approaches to evaluating the safety of a biopharmaceutical must be considered. Alternative approaches, including animal models of disease, genetically modified mice, or use of surrogate molecules, may improve the predictive value of preclinical safety assessments of species-specific biopharmaceuticals, although many caveats associated with these models must be considered. Because of the many caveats that are discussed in this article, alternative approaches should only be used to evaluate safety when the clinical candidate cannot be readily tested in at least one relevant species to identify potential hazards.