PAX8 is a paired-box gene important in embryogenesis of the thyroid, Müllerian, and renal/upper urinary tracts, and expression of PAX8 has been previously described in carcinomas from each of these sites. However, a large study including a wide variety of epithelial neoplasms from multiple organ sites other than the thyroid, kidney, or Müllerian system has not been performed. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of PAX8 immunostaining based on the evaluation of a wide range of epithelial tumors. PAX8 immunohistochemistry was performed on 1357 tumors (486 tumors in whole-tissue sections and 871 tumors in tissue microarrays, predominantly epithelial) from multiple organs. Only nuclear staining was scored as positive, and tumors were evaluated for the extent and intensity of staining. Western blot analysis with PAX8 was also performed on multiple tumor cell lines. Nuclear PAX8 staining was present in 91% (60 of 66) of thyroid tumors, 90% (158 of 176) of renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 81% (13 of 16) of renal oncocytomas, 99% (164 of 165) of high-grade ovarian serous carcinomas, 71% (32 of 49) of nonserous ovarian epithelial neoplasms, 91% (10 of 11) of cervical epithelial lesions, and 98% (152 of 155) of endometrial adenocarcinomas. Of the remaining 719 evaluated tumors, only 30 cases (4%), including 12 thymic neoplasms, 3 bladder urothelial carcinomas, 4 lung squamous cell carcinomas, 2 esophageal adenocarcinomas, 1 pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 2 cholangiocarcinomas, 1 ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor, 1 ovarian sex cord stromal tumor, 3 testicular mixed germ cell tumors, and 1 acinic cell carcinoma, showed at least weak or focal PAX8 positivity. The unexpected finding was diffuse, moderate staining of PAX8 in a subset of thymomas and thymic carcinomas. The 689 remaining tumors, including but not limited to those from the prostate, colon, stomach, liver, adrenal gland, and head and neck, and small cell carcinomas from the lung, cervix, and ovary, were PAX8 negative. PAX8 specificity was confirmed by Western blot analysis, as expression was detected only in ovarian and RCC cell lines. These results show that PAX8 is a highly sensitive marker for thyroid, renal, Müllerian, and thymic tumors. Importantly, all lung adenocarcinomas, breast and adrenal neoplasms, and the majority of gastrointestinal tumors were negative for PAX8. Therefore, PAX8 is an excellent marker for confirming primary tumor site. In a subset of cases, additional markers, including but not limited to thyroid transcription factor-1, RCC, and Wilms tumor-1, may be needed to distinguish between the 3 most common PAX8-positive tumors.

Background: Increased recognition of the indolent nature of noninvasive follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (NFVPTC) along with greater insight into the molecular alterations of these tumors has prompted endocrine pathologists to question whether these tumors warrant a diagnosis of carcinoma. However, a change in terminology would affect the rates of malignancy of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) diagnostic categories. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the percentage decrease in associated risk of malignancy for each FNA diagnostic category if NFVPTCs were no longer termed carcinomas. Methods: We evaluated a cohort of 655 FNAs with subsequent resection specimens over a 22-month time period. The diagnoses of the preceding FNAs were recorded according to the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. For cases with more than one preceding FNA, the FNA diagnosis associated with the highest risk of malignancy was identified. Slides for all resection specimens with a diagnosis of FVPTC were reviewed to identify noninvasive tumors. By definition, all of these tumors were encapsulated, partially encapsulated, or well circumscribed and lacked any indication of infiltrative growth, capsular penetration, or lymphovascular invasion. Results: Our cohort of 655 FNAs with subsequent resection specimens included 53 (8.1%) nondiagnostic (ND), 167 (25.5%) benign, 97 (14.8%) atypia/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS), 88 (13.4%) suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN), 94 (14.4%) suspicious for malignancy (SUS), and 156 (23.8%) malignant cases (POS). Surgical resections demonstrated benign findings in 309 (47.2%) and malignant tumors in 346 (52.8%), including 85 NFVPTCs accounting for 24.6% of malignancies. Our rates of malignancy for ND, benign, AUS/FLUS, SFN, SUS, and POS were 18.9%, 13.2%, 39.2%, 45.5%, 87.2%, and 98.7%, respectively. If NFVPTC were no longer termed carcinoma, these rates would drop to 17.0% (10% decrease), 5.4% (59% decrease), 21.6% (45% decrease), 37.5% (18% decrease), 45.7% (48% decrease), and 93.6% (5% decrease), respectively. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that if terminology were changed and NFVPTCs were not considered carcinomas, the rates of malignancy for FNA diagnostic categories would be substantially decreased, with the most clinically significant decrease seen in the SUS category, which demonstrated a relative decrease of nearly 50%.

In the Bethesda System for reporting thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNAs), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) is a category with limited reported follow-up and outcome data. We report a retrospective analysis of our institution's experience during nearly 4.5 years with a tiered classification scheme conforming to the Bethesda System in which repeated FNA was recommended for most patients with an initial AUS diagnosis. Of 4,691 thyroid FNAs, 512 (10.9%) had a diagnosis of AUS. Cytologic or histologic outcome data were available for 331 cases (64.6%), of which 240 (72.5%) were benign and 91 (27.5%) were malignant. Of patients with a surgical diagnosis, there was no statistically significant difference in malignancy rate among patients who went directly to surgery after a single AUS diagnosis (37/90 [41%]), patients having 2 successive AUS FNA diagnoses (22/51 [43%]), and patients with a benign aspirate after AUS (2/7 [29%]). Although AUS confers an intermediate risk of malignancy, guidelines recommending repeated FNA for most cases should be reevaluated.

If NFVPTCs were no longer termed carcinomas, this would affect the rate of malignancy of FNA diagnostic categories. Cytologic and molecular features could aid in identifying NFVPTCs at the time of FNA diagnosis.