Immunoglobulin (Ig) D multiple myeloma (MM) is a rare subtype of MM comprising 2% of all the cases. Malignant plasma cell invasion leads to signs and symptoms similar to other subtypes of MM. The synthesis rate of IgD is lower in IgD MM patients, making it very difficult to diagnose compared to other subtypes. As there is no available diagnostic test with 100% accuracy, the diagnosis of IgD MM is based on multiple factors. Recent advances in the treatment have resulted in a better overall survival for IgD MM patients. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the data on presentation patterns, diagnosis modalities, management strategies, and outcomes in patients with IgD MM.

No abstract

Background: Elotuzumab (elo) is a humanized monoclonal antibody, which has been approved by the FDA for use in combination with lenalidomide (lena) and dexamethasone (dexa) in patients (pts) with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Elotuzumab is effective as a single agent, as well as in combination for multiple myeloma treatments, supporting the use of elo in pts with RRMM and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) pts. Method: After review of literature using database searches was done on 6/27/18 (Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and Clinical Trials.gov), 9 prospective and 1 retrospective study with 1128 enrolled pts met the inclusion criteria to date in RRMM and 2 clinical trials including 123 pts in NDMM (Table 1). CMA software v.3 was used for meta-analysis. A random-effect model was applied. Result: Regimens used in RRMM: Based on pooled analysis (95% CI), an overall response rate (ORR) of 66% (54-76.2) was calculated in 685 evaluable pts treated with elo based regimens in RRMM (Figure 1). Most common grade (G) ≥ 3 hematological adverse events (HAE) and non-hematological adverse events (NHAE) based on regimen were calculated using pooled analysis in RRMM pts (Table 2). Anemia was noted in 12.1% ( 7.7-18.6) in 559 pts, while neutropenia in 14.5% (7.5-26.4) out of 591 pts and thrombocytopenia (tcp) in 11.9% (7.9-17.4) in 198 evaluable pts. Diarrhea 5.5% (3.6-8.3), pyrexia 2.4% (1.5-4), peripheral neuropathy (PN) 8.4% (3.8-17.8) were measured in 626, 668 and 143 pts respectively. Elotuzumab as monotherapy: 1 study (n=34) evaluated the efficacy of elo as single agent in RRMM. The median age, time from diagnosis and number of prior therapies were 64.5 years (y) (46-87), 4.4 y (0.9-12.8) and 4.5 y (2-10) respectively. It produced an ORR of 1.4% (0.1-19.1 95% CI) in 34 evaluable pts. Adverse events recorded were pyrexia and fatigue in 17.6% and 8.8% pts respectively. Elotuzumab in two drug regimen: In RRMM, 2 clinical trials (n=49) evaluated the efficacy (95% CI) of elo, ORR of 25% (4.1-72.3) was calculated. The best PFS (progression free survival) produced was in combination of elo 20 mg with bortezumib (bort) 1.3mg/m2 of 9.46 months as compared to 1.8 months when elo10mg/kg + dexamethasone (dexa) 28mg was used. In our analysis for safety, common G≥ 3 HAE calculated were, thrombocytopenia 8.7% (3.3-21.1) n=49, neutropenia 10.7 % (3.5-28.4) n=28 pts and anemia 7.1% (1.8-24.5) n=28 pts. NHAE included diarrhea 1.7% (0.1-22.3), PN 10.7% (3.5-28.4), pyrexia 1.7% (0.1-22.3) in 28 evaluable pts each. Elotuzumab in three drug regimen: In RRMM, 10 clinical trials including 602 pts evaluated the efficacy of elo as a part of triple drug regimen, producing an ORR of 72.2% (54-76.2). The best results were produced with the combination of elo 10-20mg/kg + lenalidomide (lena) 25mg + dexa 40mg producing a PFS of 32.2 mo and 28.62 mo in its phase I and II cohorts respectively. Based on pooled analysis (95% CI) common HAE calculated were neutropenia 17.5% (7.6-35.4) in n=563, thrombocytopenia 12.7% (8.2-19.4) in n=149 and anemia 13% (8-20.5) in n=531 pts. Common G ≥ 3 NHAE estimated were diarrhea 5.7% (3.7-8.6), PN 6.6% (2-19.2), pyrexia 2.5% (1.5-4.1) in 598, 115 and 640 pts respectively. Elotuzumab based regimen in NDMM: A currently ongoing clinical trial NCT02272803 has produced promising results in NDMM pts. As a part of three drug regimen with dose of elo 10mg/kg-20mg/kg, lena 25mg, dexa 20mg in 40 pts produced an ORR of 87.5% (73.2-95.8) versus control group of lena 25mg plus dexa 40mg in 42 pts with an ORR of 73.8% (58-86.1). The PFS rate recorded at 1 year was 93% (79-98%) and 91% (73-97%) respectively. The HAE G ≥ 3 included, neutropenia 18% and leukopenia 15%. In another study with 41 pts, elo was used in combination with lena, bort and dexa producing an ORR of 100% and greater than grade 3 adverse events including Tcp 15%, PN 2%. Conclusion: Results produced in our study suggest that elotuzumab is highly effective when used in pts with RRMM and NDMM. Combination regimens for elo produces an ORR ranging from 79-83% with elo + lena+ dexa, proving that the best results were produced by three drug regimens. Large prospective studies are required to evaluate efficacy and safety of elotuzumab in combination therapies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Background Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) represents a heterogeneous group of diseases with clonal proliferation, bone marrow failure and increase risk of progression to acute leukemia. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) modulate the epigenetics of cancer cells to promote differentiation and programmed cell death. Our aim is to study the efficacy and safety of HDACi in patients with MDS/ acute myeloid leukemia (AML). HDACi can be a safer alternative in patients with high risk MDS who are not eligible for stem cell transplantation or high intensity chemotherapy. Methods A comprehensive literature search was done using following 5 databases: (Pubmed,Embase,Web of Science,Cochrane library,Clinical Trials.Gov) in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. We included 21 trials (Phase II/III ) with a total 1654 patients,of which 1030 patients recieved HDACi and were evaluable for respone. Our primary objective was to determine efficacy of HDACi based regimen in terms of overall response rate (ORR) and composite complete response rate (CCR). A meta-analysis was done for regimen that were evaluated in more than one trials to report ORR and CRR.CMA software V.3 was used to run metaanalysis to calculate the response and the heterogenity among studies were assesed by using I2 test.A random -effect model was applied. Results: The pooled analysis (95% CI) with 1030 evaluable patients in MDS/ AML showed an overall response rate of 37.1% (32.3-42.3 : I2= 86.105 )with composite response (comp CR=CR+Cri+mCR) of 30.8%(26.8-35.1) .The median overall survival of those who received HDACi ranges from 8 -25 months.The Base line Characterstics,Outcome and Toxicity of HDACi in MDS/AML are summarized in Table 1. In the meta-analysis (n=57) of two trials (Garcia et al, 2007 & Luger et al. 2013), combination regimen of Mocetinostat- Azacytidine had an ORR of 54%(95% CI: 10.2-92.3) and composite complete response (CCR) of 18.9% (95% CI :9.3-34.7) in patients with MDS/AML. Combination of Vorinostat-Cytarabine-Idarubicin had an ORR of 50.7% (95% CI :40.7-96.5) and CCR of 30.1% (95% CI: in 111 patients with MDS/AML in a meta-analysis of trials by Prebet et al. 2013 and Manero et al. 2012. The meta-analysis of 3 trials evaluating Vorinostat-Azacitadine regimen (Craddock et al. 2017; Sekers et al. 2017 & Montalbano et al. 2016) had an ORR 38.3%( 95 % CI :18-63) CCR of 29%(95% CI: 11-58) in a total patient population of 274 patients. The regimen of Valproate- Deictibine/Cytarabine was evaluated in 3 separate trials with a total patient population of 156 which showed an ORR of 41.6% (95 % CI :20.9-65.6)and a CCR of 28.3%(95% CI 18.9-42.7) in the metanalysis. The meta-analysis of 3 trials evaluating a three-drug regimen of Valproate-Azacytadine-All trans retinoic acid(ATRA) showed an ORR of 32.2%(95% CI :24.2-41.3) and CCR of 23.7%(95 %CI 13.1-39.0) in 144 MDS/AML patients. In a trial by Manero et al (2017), the combination of Pracinostat and Azacitadine had an ORR of 67.5% (95% CI :51.7-80.01) CCR of 60%(95% CI 44.3-73.8) in 51 AML/MDS patients. A single trial evaluating regimen of Panobinostat and Azacitadine (n=40) had an ORR of 37.5% and CCR of 27.5%. Combination of Panobinostat and Decitabine in a trial by Geoffry et al in 2017 (n=52), the ORR was 21.2% and CCR of 19.2%.The Overall response rate and Composite response rate of HDACi in MDS/AML are mentioned in Table 2 and Table 3. Conclusion: Most of the HDACi like Mocetinostat,Valproic acid ,Pracinostat when used in combination with either Hypomethylating agents(Azacytidine ,decitabine) or purine analogs (cytarabine/idarubicin) produced a good response.Pracinostat in combination with azacytidine showed the best ORR among the studies but there was only single study mentioning this combination.Single agent studies with resposne were also not evaluable.Most of MDS patients get resistant to hypomethlating agent thus there is need to explore newer agents and HDACi agents is a promising group. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

BackgroundCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is associated with troponin elevation, which is associated with increased mortality. However, it is not clear if troponin elevation is independently linked to increased mortality in COVID-19 patients. Although there is considerable literature on risk factors for mortality in COVID-19-associated myocardial injury, the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE), Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores have not been studied in COVID-19-related myocardial injury. This data is important in risk-stratifying COVID-19 myocardial injury patients.