Many resources have been developed to support particular evaluation methodologies. However, the more complex problems of helping academics decide which methodology best suits their needs and then create a plan that will allow them to implement this remain largely unaddressed. In this paper, a toolkit is described that attempts to tackle these problems. A two-part evaluation of the toolkit's impact is then presented, which demonstrates that this approach does enhance design, supports reflection and prompts users to consider the most appropriate, not just the most familiar, approach to evaluation.

Computer-assisted learning programs (CALs) were embedded in a course on general pathology for medical students at the University of Edinburgh Medical School. Students' reactions to the programs were evaluated. Students completed written questionnaires and were interviewed and observed as they used the CALs. Students liked the CALs and felt that they were integrated with other parts of their teaching and aided them in understanding the subject material. Different question styles were variably appreciated. The most useful aspects of the CALs were the interactive parts (questions and answers), summaries, pictures, learning at the individual's own pace, and question practice, especially with MCQs. Students found the CALs an effective learning tool, particularly when linked with other course components as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, other learning methods.

No abstract

Computer-assisted learning programs (CALs) were embedded in a course on general pathology for medical students at the University of Edinburgh Medical School. Students' reactions to the programs were evaluated. Students completed written questionnaires and were interviewed and observed as they used the CALs. Students liked the CALs and felt that they were integrated with other parts of their teaching and aided them in understanding the subject material. Different question styles were variably appreciated. The most useful aspects of the CALs were the interactive parts (questions and answers), summaries, pictures, learning at the individual's own pace, and question practice, especially with MCQs. Students found the CALs an effective learning tool, particularly when linked with other course components as a complement to, rather than a replacement for, other learning methods.

This Chapter examines the extent to which we can assess whether accredited professional development programmes for academics have improved teaching -and students' learning -in higher education. A review of the literature will be presented, along with new research undertaken in our home institution. The authors are part of a team delivering accredited programmes in teaching at tertiary level, and have collaborated to examine the impact of their work and that of the team over more than ten years in this area. Our findings from both the literature and our most recent research within our own institution indicate a range of benefits for higher education in providing and supporting accredited programmes for educators. However, we have also identified methodological issues in measuring these benefits and impact overall. The Chapter will discuss this work and connect it with the broader themes of this book. We emphasise the importance of effective teaching in the midst of the many complex changes influencing higher education at this time.