<p>Objetivo: identificar as principais tecnologias em saúde aplicadas às pessoas com hanseníase, para a promoção do autocuidado. Método: revisão integrativa realizada nas bases de dados Hansen, LILACS, BDENF, MEDLINE, SciELO, CINAHL, Web of Science e na Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde Hanseníase, por meio do cruzamento dos descritores Hanseníase, Tecnologia em Saúde e Autocuidado. Foram incluídos os artigos publicados no período de 2008 a 2018 nos idiomas inglês, espanhol e português. Resultados: foram selecionados 19 artigos, nos quais se identificaram as tecnologias educativas, com base na formação de grupos, palestras e oficinas, assim como as tecnologias assistenciais, com base na observação, investigação sobre as práticas de cuidados e na utilização de instrumentos. Conclusão: as tecnologias assistenciais foram as mais aplicadas às pessoas com hanseníase, para a promoção do autocuidado.</p><p>Descritores: Hanseníase. Tecnologia em Saúde. Autocuidado.</p>

No abstract

The editorial team greatly appreciates the reviewers who have dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal's rigorous editorial process over the past 12 months, regardless of whether the papers are finally published or not. In 2019, a total of 317 papers were published in the journal, with a median time to first decision of 22 days and a median time from submission to publication of 55 days. The editors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for their generous contribution in 2019:Abbas, Azhar

No abstract

Objective: To build and validate an educational technology in the form of a booklet, aimed at the family members of people with venous ulcers to assist them in their care. Methods: A methodological study, which went through the stages of bibliographic survey and situational diagnosis for the construction of the booklet and validation of content, appearance, and adequacy with judges and the target audience. The Content Validity Index, the Suitability Assessment of Materials, and the Concordance Index were used. Results: In the validation with the content and appearance judges, the booklet showed an excellent overall Content Validity Index (tCVI=0.92). The technical judges evaluated the booklet as “superior” (average of 91%). The booklet underwent adjustments, and validation was performed with the target population, reaching an agreement rate higher than 75%. Conclusion: The educational booklet developed was validated for content and appearance and considered suitable for use by family members of people with venous ulcers.