No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

We conducted telephone interviews with twenty-five professors and students, or former students, who have been involved in consensual sexual relationships. We examined the extent to which respondents' experiences are consistent with "lecherous professor" stereotypes. We also assessed differences in the perceptions and experiences of professors and students, and how these may be influenced by gender, raceiethnicity, sexual orientation, and undergraduate or graduate student status. Finally, we evaluated whether the experiences and perceptions of respondents suggest that these relationships should be controlled by institutional policies. We found little support for the "lecherous professor" stereotype based on our respondents' experiences. Twothirds of the relationships were initiated by a student or were mutually initiated by student and professor. All students said they entered freely into these relationships. For many of our respondents, issues related to raceiethnicity, sexuality, and age brought greater challenges to the relationship than did the professor/student status difference. We found that negative reactions from others tended to be most extreme for those who crossed multiple status boundaries. Students, in particular, cited the power difference between professors and students as the greatest detriment in these relationships, although both students and professors tended to refer to power issues in abstract rather than personal terms. Although most students and professors said they would enter into such a relationship again, most advised others against doing so. Nearly all respondents thought consensual relationships were inappropriate in supervisory situations, and they supported institutional policies that prohibit them in such circumstances.Although consensual sexual relationships between professors and students are not new to college and university campuses, they have received increasing attention in recent years as faculty and administrators debate the ethical and legal issues involved, as well as the pros and cons of institutional policies designed t o discourage or prohibit them (Begley,

Research on pornography has distinguished between its violent and nonviolent forms. Analyses of the content of violent pornography have largely focused on readily available soft-core images in adult films and magazines. However, current research has not adequately addressed pornography on the Internet. We show that discussions about violent pornography are incomplete without an understanding of the Internet as a unique and rapidly expanding medium for disseminating images of sexual violence against women. This article attempts to fill that gap by examining violent pornography using a sample of 31 free Internet sites. Each site was analyzed for its portrayal of women victims, male perpetrators, and its story of rape. Please be advised that the analysis contains graphic descriptions of violence toward women found on Internet rape sites.