The modes of action of the commercial solvent extractants used in extractive hydrometallurgy are classified according to whether the recovery process involves the transport of metal cations, M(n+), metalate anions, MXx(n-), or metal salts, MXx into a water-immiscible solvent. Well-established principles of coordination chemistry provide an explanation for the remarkable strengths and selectivities shown by most of these extractants. Reagents which achieve high selectivity when transporting metal cations or metal salts into a water-immiscible solvent usually operate in the inner coordination sphere of the metal and provide donor atom types or dispositions which favour the formation of particularly stable neutral complexes that have high solubility in the hydrocarbons commonly used in recovery processes. In the extraction of metalates, the structures of the neutral assemblies formed in the water-immiscible phase are usually not well defined and the cationic reagents can be assumed to operate in the outer coordination spheres. The formation of secondary bonds in the outer sphere using, for example, electrostatic or H-bonding interactions are favoured by the low polarity of the water-immiscible solvents.

Interactions, particularly hydrogen bonds, between ligands in the outer coordination spheres of metal complexes have a major effect on their stabilities in the hydrocarbon solvents used in commercial solvent extraction and it is now possible to use these interactions to tune the strength and selectivity of extractants.

Eight new amido functionalized reagents, L 1 −L 8 , have been synthesized containing the sequence of atoms R 2 N−CH 2 −NR′−CO−R″, which upon protonation forms a six-membered chelate with a hydrogen bond between the tertiary ammonium N−H + group and the amido oxygen atom. The monocationic ligands, LH + , extract tetrachloridometal(II)ates from acidic solutions containing high concentrations of chloride ions via a mechanism in which two ligands address the "outer sphere" of the [MCl 4 ] 2unit using both N−H and C−H hydrogen bond donors to form the neutral complex as in 2L + 2HCl + MCl 2 ⇌ [(LH) 2 MCl 4 ]. The strengths of L 1 −L 8 as zinc extractants in these pH-dependent equilibria have been shown to be very dependent on the number of amide groups in the R 3-n N(CH 2 NR′COR″) n molecules, anti-intuitively decreasing with the number of strong hydrogen bond donors present and following the order monoamides > diamides > triamides. Studies of the effects of chloride concentration on extraction have demonstrated that the monoamides in particular show an unusually high selectivity for [ZnCl 4 ] 2over [FeCl 4 ] − and Cl − . Hybrid-DFT calculations on the tri-, di-, and monoamides, L 2 , L 3 , and L 4 , help to rationalize these orders of strength and selectivity. The monoamide L 4 has the most favorable protonation energy because formation of the LH + cation generates a "chelated proton" structure as described above without having to sacrifice an existing intramolecular amide−amide hydrogen bond. The selectivity of extraction of [ZnCl 4 ] 2over Cl − , represented by the process 2[(LH)Cl] + ZnCl 4 2-⇌ [(LH) 2 ZnCl 4 ] + 2Cl − , is most favorable for L 4 because it is less effective at binding chloride as it has fewer highly polar N−H hydrogen bond donor groups to interact with this "hard" anion.

Four new sterically hindered pyridines, L(1)-L(4)-containing amido substituents at the 2-position act as efficient solvent extractants for [CoCl(4)](2-) or [ZnCl(4)](2-) from acidic chloride solutions through protonation of the pyridino N-centre to form the neutral outer-sphere complexes [(LH)(2)MCl(4)]. These ionophores show very high selectivity for chlorometallate anions over chloride ion and are readily stripped to liberate the free-metal chlorides without the formation of inner-sphere complexes [ML(2)Cl(2)]. Single-crystal X-ray structure determinations of [(L(2)H)(2)CoCl(4)] and [(L(2)H)(2)ZnCl(4)] (L(2) = 2-(4,6-di-tert-butylpyridin-2-yl)-N,N'-dihexylmalonamide) coupled with (1)H NMR spectroscopy and DFT calculations on L(2)H(+) and other complexes of [ZnCl(4)](2-) confirm that the pyridinium NH group does not address the outer co-ordination sphere of the metallanion, but rather forms a hydrogen bond to the pendant amide groups and thus pre-organizes the ligand to present both C-H and amido N-H hydrogen-bond donors to the [MCl(4)](2-) ions. The selectivity for chlorometallates over chloride ions shown by this class of extractants arises from their ability to present several polarized C-H units towards the charge-diffuse ions [MCl(4)](2-), whereas the smaller, "harder" chloride anion prefers to be associated with the amido N-H hydrogen-bond donors.

A series of 22 tridentate unsaturated mono-anionic ligands having the atom-sequence Y-C[double bond, length as m-dash]C-N=CH-C=C-Z(-1), with Y = N, O, or S and Z = O or S, has been studied to establish whether this backbone could be used to develop strong solvent extractants for nickel(II) which will preferably also show a high selectivity over iron(III) in the pH-dependent process: 2LH(org) + NiSO4 ⇌ [(L)2Ni]org + H2SO4. All are capable of forming octahedral [(L)2Ni] complexes with a mer-arrangement of the YNZ(-1) donor set. X-ray crystal structures of three salicylaldimine proligands derived from 3-bromo-5-t-butyl-2-hydroxybenzaldehyde show these to have pre-organised donor sets in which the three donors are held in an approximately orthogonal arrangement by intramolecular hydrogen bonds. The tautomers observed are dependent on the nature of the Y atom and the extent to which it is favourable for this to form a bonding interaction with the acidic hydrogen atom on the salicylaldimine unit. X-ray crystal structure determinations of seven of the [(L)2Ni] complexes show these to have significantly distorted octahedral coordination geometries which partly account for the proligands proving to be fairly weak Ni-extractants. DFT calculations show that extractant strength is dependent on a combination of the binding strength of the YNZ(-1) donor set to the nickel ion and on the ease of deprotonation of the extractant. On this basis 3-nitro-4-t-octyl-6-(quinolin-8-imino)phenol is predicted, and is found, to be the strongest Ni-extractant. The extractants have low hydrolytic stability, reverting to their aldehyde precursors when solutions in water-immiscible solvents are contacted with aqueous acid, making them poor candidates for development as reagents for nickel recovery based on pH-swing processes of the type shown above.