The article explores how normative notions of emotions and interaction are active in constructions of the categories of "human" and "animal" in different discourses about autism: scientific and autobiographical. In the scientific discourse of autistic emotionality, a deficit perspective of autism is central. The general affective deficit discourse relies on normative discursive notions of "humanity" or "human emotionality." Thus, neurotypicals are produced as real "humans" and neurotypical emotionality as "normal" human emotionality. This human normativity is challenged in the Swedish autobiographical texts by Gunilla Gerland (b. 1963), Iris Johansson (b. 1945) and Immanuel Brändemo (b. 1980). Along with American authors of autobiographies about autism, such as Temple Grandin's Thinking in Pictures (1995) and Dawn Prince-Hughes' Songs of the Gorilla Nation (2004) they destabilize the categories of "human" and "animal" by identifying with nonhuman animals, describing themselves as such, or feeling disqualified as real humans.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

The Teaching of Literature and the Disciplining of Reading The article discusses how the institutional norm of critical reading tends to rule out other ways of reading. Instead of mapping different kinds of reading practices and providing useful concepts for describing them, the teaching of literature often tends to be prescriptive and aimed at reproducing this specific way of reading, and in extension, a certain view of literature related to it. This problem is discussed in connection to Rita Felski’s »modes of textual engagements,« Michael Warner’s questioning of what qualifies as a critical reading, and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s concept of »reparative reading.«