Study Type – Therapy (prospective cohort) Level of Evidence 2a What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? In the West, transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) in renal transplant patients is uncommon, but aggressive. Conversely, it appears to be frequent in the Far East, necessitating aggressive surgical approaches such as prophylactic nephroureterectomy. There are few European case series to date. TCC in the present population was predominantly low‐grade and superficial, with no progression in patients with those tumours. Endoscopic management was sufficient for most patients. The behaviour of TCC in the present population was much less aggressive than that described in the Far East. Altering immunosuppression regimes may have a role to play in managing bladder cancer in renal transplant patients. OBJECTIVE To examine the clinical characteristics, management and long‐term outcomes of patients with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) who also have had renal transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective case note review was performed for the 15‐year period 1995–2009. Searches from three different urological centres in the UK, using multiple sources, yielded 1647 patients with renal transplants, 12 of whom had TCC. Eight cases were identified who developed de novo TCC after transplantation (0.48%). Four patients had pre‐existing TCC who then had renal transplantation. The current literature was reviewed. RESULTS In the eight de novo TCC cases, the bladder was the site in all with no upper tract TCC; seven were superficial (pTa/T1) and five were low grade (G1/2). The mean time to development of TCC after transplant was 5 years, with a mean follow‐up of 11 years. There was no progression in low‐grade superficial disease that was managed endoscopically. The 5‐ and 10‐year overall survival was 83% and 72%, respectively. In patients with pre‐existing TCC prophylactic bilateral nephroureterectomy before transplantation was performed once. There was progression of superficial disease whilst on immunosuppression in one patient. Sirolimus was used in patients with TCC and reports suggest this may have a role to play in modifying malignancy in this setting. The number of patients involved in studies particularly focusing on TCC in renal transplantation is small (136 patients), with 60% from China/Taiwan where there is a high incidence of upper tract TCC and high‐grade muscle‐invasive disease. CONCLUSIONS Although this is one of the largest European case series of renal transplant patients with TCC, the numbers are small making clear conclusions difficult. The frequency of TCC in our renal transplant population is low, consistent with previous studies. However, contrary to prior studies, TCC after renal transplantation in this European population was predominantly superficial, low‐grade, non‐progressive and confined to the bladder. Altering immunosuppression regimes in patients with TCC may have a role to play, although further work is required to clarify and substantiate this.
The Pedagogy-Space-Technology (PST) Framework (Radcliffe, 2009) is a framework that has been used to guide the creation of new and modern teaching spaces. This paper highlights the journey of an Innovation@CDU Grant Project which uses the PST Framework to build an online moot court which is able to ensure that both internal students on campus and external students online are able to moot effectively. The project uses Blackboard Collaborate™ and the PST Framework. The technology has been implemented in Charles Darwin University (CDU) to create the new teaching spaces in CDU. The same technology in the new teaching spaces is then used to build an online moot court. The paper explains the PST Framework and discusses how the framework has been used and applied to further innovations such as an online moot court. It also explains the project's journey and the challenges and successes of the project.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.