Purpose: There is an unmet need for noninvasive markers to measure the biological effects of targeted agents, particularly those inhibiting the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor (VEGFR) pathway, and identify patients most likely to benefit from treatment. In this study, we investigated potential blood-based biomarkers for SU11248 (sunitinib malate), a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with metastatic imatinib-refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Experimental Design: Patients (n = 73) enrolled in a phase I/II trial received SU11248 daily for 14 or 28 days followed by 14 days without treatment per cycle. Clinical benefit was defined as progression-free survival of >6 months. We assessed plasma markers, including VEGF and soluble VEGFR-2 (sVEGFR-2), and two cellular populations bearing VEGF receptors: monocytes and, in a subset of patients, mature circulating endothelial cells (CEC). Results: Compared to patients with progressive disease, patients with clinical benefit had significantly greater increases in CECs (0.52 versus −−0.01 CEC/μL/d, P = 0.03) and smaller decreases in monocyte levels (47% versus 60%, P = 0.007) during cycle 1. VEGF increased by 2.2-fold and sVEGFR-2 decreased 25% during the first 2 weeks of treatment. Neither plasma marker correlated with clinical outcome although a modest inverse correlation was observed between sVEGFR-2 changes and plasma drug levels. Monocytes, VEGF, and sVEGFR-2 all rebounded towards baseline off treatment. Conclusions: Monocytes, VEGF, and sVEGFR-2 were consistently modulated by treatment, suggesting that they may serve as pharmacodynamic markers for SU11248. Changes in CECs and monocytes, but not the plasma markers, differed between the patients with clinical benefit and those with progressive disease. These end points merit further investigation in future trials to determine their utility as markers of SU11248 activity and clinical benefit in gastrointestinal stromal tumors and other tumor types.

Purpose: Circulating endothelial cells (CEC) comprise at least two distinct populations: bone marrow–derived circulating endothelial progenitors (CEP) and mature CECs derived from existing vasculature. We hypothesized that antiangiogenic agents may have differential effects on CEPs and mature CECs and that these changes may serve as a marker of biological activity. Experimental Design: The effect of angiogenesis inhibitors on CECs was evaluated by flow cytometry after vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)–induced mobilization and in mice bearing Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC). Tumor angiogenesis was evaluated in parallel by immunohistochemistry. Results: In nontumor-bearing mice, VEGF administration increased both mature CECs and CEPs. This increase was inhibited by the VEGF receptor 2 inhibitor ZD6474 as well as the VEGF inhibitor–soluble Flt-1. ZD6474 had no significant effect on CECs in the absence of exogenous VEGF stimulation. In contrast, LLC-bearing mice had an increase in mature CECs but not CEPs after 3 days of treatment with ZD6474. The increase in mature CECs was dose-dependent, accompanied by a decrease in tumor microvessel density, and preceded reduction in tumor volume. Treatment of LLC-bearing mice with the vascular targeting agent ZD6126 also increased mature CECs. Conclusions: VEGF inhibitors can have differential effects on mature CECs and CEPs, and agents inhibiting tumor angiogenesis may cause a concomitant increase in mature CECs. This increase occurs in tumor-bearing but not in nontumor-bearing mice, suggesting that tumor endothelium is a potential source of mature CECs. Therefore, assessing both mature CECs and CEPs may provide insights into the mechanism of antiangiogenic agents and serve as an early surrogate marker of biological activity.

MBC patients had worse survival than non-MBC patients, independent of receptor status, suggesting that MBC may confer an additional survival disadvantage. Multimodal therapy was associated with improved outcomes, but ALND was not and may be overutilized in MBC.

In node-positive patients, pCR limited to either the breast or axilla predicts survival for select receptor subtypes. In patients achieving pCR in both the breast and axilla, survival is driven by response to NACT rather than presenting cN stage.

We show here that recombinant endostatin protein has a biphasic effect on the inhibition of endothelial cell migration in vitro. In tumor-bearing animals, there is a similar biphasic effect on the inhibition of tumor growth and on circulating endothelial cells after once-daily s.c. injections. This biphasic effect is revealed as a U-shaped curve in which efficacy is optimal between very low and very high doses depending on the tumor type. This result may be applicable to other inhibitors of endothelial growth and to angiogenesis. Furthermore, these results have important implications for clinicians who administer angiogenesis inhibitors for cancer or other angiogenesis-dependent diseases. When these results are taken together with two previous reports of angiogenesis inhibitors with a U-shaped dose-response, they suggest that other regulators of endothelial growth may display a similar pattern. (Cancer Res 2005; 65(23): 11044-50)