Background Lumbar fusion (LF) is commonly performed to manage lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD) that has failed conservative measures. However, lumbar disc replacement (LDR) procedures are increasingly prevalent and designed to preserve motion in carefully selected patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS), queried from 2010 to 2019 to identify patients undergoing single and double-level LF or LDR with a diagnosis of LDDD using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th (ICD-9) and 10th (ICD-10) revision diagnostic and procedure codes. Propensity score matching (PSM) with a ratio of 2:1 was performed. All cost estimates reflect reported hospital costs adjusted to December 2019 United States Dollars. Results A total of 1,129,121 LF cases (99.3%) and 8,049 LDR cases (0.7%) were identified, with 364,637 (32.3%) and 712 (8.8%) comprising two-level surgeries, respectively. 1,712 LDRs were performed in 2010 (1.27% of all), decreasing to 565 in 2013 (0.52%), and increased slightly to 870 in 2019 (0.74%). LDR patients were significantly more likely to be younger (mean age 41.2 vs. 57.1, P<0.001) and healthier (mean ECI 0.88 vs. 1.80, P<0.001). On matched analysis, LDR hospital costs were $4,529 less (P<0.001) and length of stay was 0.65 days shorter (P<0.001) than LF patients. LDR patients had lower rates of any complication (7.0% vs. 13.2%, P<0.001), neurologic complication (3.0% vs. 4.2%, P=0.006), and blood transfusion (3.1% vs. 8.1%, P<0.001) compared to LF patients. Conclusions The prevalence of LDR procedures decreased from 2010–2017 but began to increase again in 2018 and 2019. Single-level LDR was associated with reduced costs and length of stay (LOS), and lower rates of blood transfusion compared to LF in patients with LDDD.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction: Distal third forearm fractures are common fractures in children. While outcomes are generally excellent, some patients fail initial non-operative management and require intervention. The purpose of this study is to identify independent risk factors associated with failure of closed reduction. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of distal third forearm fractures in children treated with closed reduction and casting. Patients were divided into two cohorts—those who were successfully closed reduced and those who failed initial non-operative management. Demographic characteristics, cast type, cast index, radiographic fracture, soft tissue characteristics, and quality of reduction were analyzed between groups. Results: A total of 207 children treated for distal third forearm fractures were included for analysis. A total of 190 (91.8%) children maintained their reduction while 17 (8.2%) failed initial non-operative management. Modifiable risk factors associated with loss of reduction on univariate analysis included the use of a long arm cast (p = 0.003), increased post-reduction displacement (p = 0.02), and increased post-reduction angular deformity (p = 0.01). Non-modifiable risk factors included increased body mass index (p = 0.02), increased presenting fracture displacement (p = 0.002), and increased width of the soft tissue envelope at the fracture site (p = 0.0001). The use of long arm casts (13% vs 2%, odds ratio = 6.44) and soft tissue width (60.6 vs 50.4 mm, odds ratio = 1.1) remained significant risk factors for loss of reduction after multivariate analysis. Conclusion: Both larger soft tissue envelope at the site of the fracture and long arm cast immobilization are independently associated with an increased risk of failing initial closed reduction in distal third forearm fractures in the pediatric population. Level of evidence: level III Case Control Study