Since the introduction of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists, an extensive amount of literature investigating the role of the downregulation protocols on pregnancy outcomes has been published. However, these studies were mainly performed in the general infertile population where patients with endometriosis were often excluded or underrepresented. This study is a large retrospective cohort study including 386 endometriosis patients undergoing IVF/ICSI, who had been previously classified according to the rAFS system. Patients were stimulated either a long GnRH agonist or GnRH antagonist protocol. Depending on endometriosis stage, patients were divided into two groups: endometriosis stage I-II and endometriosis stage III-IV. Each group was subdivided, based on the type GnRH analog used. When comparing the GnRH agonist and antagonist groups, patients with endometriosis stage I-II, had a tendency toward higher β-hCG positive, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates (42.8% vs. 26.7%; p = .07) in favor of GnRH agonist use. In endometriosis stage III-IV, no differences were observed between agonist and antagonist cycle in any of the pregnancy outcomes. Multivariate regression analysis did not reveal any significant predictor of live birth after adjusting for relevant confounders. Based on our findings, the chance to have a liveborn in endometriosis population seems not to be affected by the type of GnRH analog used, at least in advanced stages. Findings from stage I-II endometriosis cases merit consideration and further evaluation in a larger sample size is warranted.

No abstract

No abstract

Objective The aim of this study is to analyze post‐cesarean morphine consumption using continuous ropivacaine subfascial wound infusion. Methods After standardized spinal anesthesia (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 8–10 mg combined with sufentanil 2–2.5 μg), women undergoing cesarean section (n = 69) were randomly allocated to receive either ropivacaine 0.2% (n = 35) or NaCl 0.9% (n = 34) infused through a subfascial wound catheter during 48 h in a multimodal analgesic approach. As primary outcome, opioid use by intravenous patient‐controlled analgesia was analyzed. Secondary outcomes were intensity of pain on visual analog scale at rest and at mobilization, postoperative nausea/vomiting, pruritus and time of first ambulation. Independent t test or Mann–Whitney U test, and Pearson's χ2 test or Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate. Results Morphine consumption was significantly lower in the ropivacaine group (21.52 ± 21.56 mg) compared with the placebo group (29.57 ± 22.38 mg; 95% confidence interval −18.8 to 2.76; p = 0.047). No significant differences were observed in pain evaluated by visual analog scale, except for pain at mobilization 6 h after surgery (ropivacaine versus placebo: 3.90 ± 2.66 versus 5.36 ± 2.55; p = 0.030). No significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative nausea/vomiting, pruritus, and time of first ambulation. Conclusion Continuous ropivacaine subfascial wound infusion results in less post‐cesarean morphine consumption. EudraCT trail registration number: 2017‐004797‐33. EudraCT link: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2017-004797-33/BE#A