BACKGROUND Type II odontoid fractures are a common cervical fracture in older people. Lower osseous-union rates are reported in those treated conservatively compared to surgically; however, the clinical relevance of a nonunion is unknown. OBJECTIVE To compare pain, disability, and quality of life in older people following conservative management of type II odontoid fractures demonstrating osseous-union and nonunion. METHODS Electronic records were searched from 2008 to 2018 for adults ≥65 yr with type II odontoid fracture, managed in a semi-rigid collar. Clinical and demographic data were retrieved from electronic patient notes. Surviving patients were invited to complete questionnaires to assess pain, disability, and quality of life. Ethical approval was granted. RESULTS A total of 125 patients were identified: 36 (29%) demonstrated osseous-union, 89 (71%) had nonunion, of which 33 (40%) had radiological instability. Mean age at fracture was 84 yr (osseous-union 83 yr; nonunion 84 yr). A total of 53 had deceased (41 nonunion). Median length of survival was 77 mo for osseous-union vs 50 mo for nonunion; P = .02. No patient developed myelopathy during the follow-up period. Questionnaire response rate was 39 (58%). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of pain, disability, or quality of life (P > .05). Both groups reported mild disability and pain but low quality of life. CONCLUSION Management with a semi-rigid collar in older people with type II odontoid fracture is associated with low levels of pain and disability without statistically significant differences between those demonstrating osseous-union or stable or unstable nonunions. Conservative management appears to be a safe treatment for older people with type II fractures.

No abstract

Objectives: The study aims to evaluate therapeutic strategies in the management of craniospinal tumours in pregnant patients and the factors that influence the management along with their influence on maternal & foetal outcomes. Materials and Methods:A retrospective single-centre cohort study was performed at a tertiary neurosurgical referral centre. Pregnant patients referred to neuro-oncology multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) with craniospinal tumour were included. Ten-year patient data were collected from hospital records and neuro-oncology MDM outcomes. A systematic review was performed on the available literature in PubMed as per PRISMA guidelines. Results:Thirty-three patients were identified with a mean age of 31 years. 91%(n=30) had cranial lesions and 9%(n=3) had spinal lesions. Most of the patients had WHO Grade I/II tumours. 33.3% underwent surgery when pregnant whilst in 24.2% this was deferred until after the due date. 27.2% patients did not require surgical intervention and were followed up with serial imaging in the MDM. Left Lateral/park bench position was the preferred position for the spinal and posterior fossa lesions. Systematic review identified 26 eligible articles. Treatment algorithms are proposed addressing the therapeutic strategy for management of cranio-spinal tumours during pregnancy and the challenges for maternal and foetal outcomes were tabulated. Conclusions:Craniospinal tumours presenting in pregnancy are challenging. The surgical management needs to be tailored individually and as part of a multidisciplinary team approach. Maternal and foetal outcomes are to be considered during patient counselling.

and total length-of-care, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess the effect of Cognitive Symptom Ratio (CSR), defined as cognitive symptom score divided by Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS) score, on RTL duration.RESULTS: Of 653 athletes evaluated within 5 days of their concussion, 343 patients were included in the final cohort. Athletes reported a median initial PCSS score of 21 (IQR 6-37) and a median cognitive symptom score of 4 (IQR 0-9). Most patients endorsed some degree of "difficulty concentrating" (n = 212, 61.3%). Median CSR was 0.18 (IQR 0.00-0.27). On multivariable regression analysis, higher CSR was associated with prolonged RTL duration (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.69, p = .004). When initial PCSS was added to the model, the previously significant association between CSR and RTL was no longer significant (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.29-1.59, p = .367). When dichotomized based on frequency distribution, a higher proportion of low CSR patients achieved RTL by 7 days post-injury (82.2% vs. 69.9%, p = .007), a difference not seen at 14 days (92.2% vs. 87.3%, p = .133).CONCLUSIONS: Acute cognitive symptom scores can predict who may be at increased risk for prolonged RTL and which patients with normal PCSS scores may experience difficulties once resuming school activities.

At the start of the COVID‐19 pandemic, some US workers became “essential” overnight and were, therefore, ineligible to work from home. Millions of these workers put their lives at risk to keep society functioning. So, why do we undervalue those we cannot live without? This article explores the transformative potential of learning in and about essential work in the wake of social and economic disruptions of a pandemic. We ask, what potential does this current moment hold to repair the western social and economic order predicated on the precarity of essential work? We review human flourishing within a human capabilities approach and borrow feminist's notion of repair work that evokes transformative learning in individuals and society. Finally, we consider how the perspective of “learning to repair” along the spirit of uBuntu and generative Communitas can enhance transformative learning theory and practice.