Background:
There is a paucity of evidence-based, posthospital stroke care in the United States proven to reduce preventable hospital readmissions.
Local Problem:
Follow-up with a provider after hospitalization for stroke or transient ischemic attack had low compliance rates. This may contribute to preventable readmissions.
Methods:
A retrospective, descriptive chart review to determine whether an advanced practice registered nurse (APRN)-led transitional care clinic for stroke survivors impacted 30- and 90-day hospital readmissions. Readmissions between clinic patients and nonclinic patients were compared.
Interventions:
The site implemented an APRN-led transitional care stroke clinic to improve patient transitions from hospital to home.
Results:
The 30-day readmission proportion was significantly higher in nonclinic patients (n = 335) than in clinic patients (n = 68) (13.4% vs 1.5%, respectively; P = .003). The 90-day readmission proportion was numerically higher in nonclinic patients (12.8% vs 4.4%, respectively; P = .058).
Conclusions:
The results suggest the APRN-led clinic may impact 30-day hospital readmissions in stroke/transient ischemic attack survivors.
ObjectiveTo determine whether Bispectral Index™ values obtained during flotation-restricted environment stimulation technique have a similar profile in a single observation compared to literature-derived results found during sleep and other relaxation-induction interventions.ResultsBispectral Index™ values were as follows: awake-state, 96.6; float session-1, 84.3; float session-2, 82.3; relaxation-induction, 82.8; stage I sleep, 86.0; stage II sleep, 66.2; and stages III–IV sleep, 45.1. Awake-state values differed from float session-1 (%difference 12.7%; Cohen’s d = 3.6) and float session-2 (%difference 14.8%; Cohen’s d = 4.6). Relaxation-induction values were similar to float session-1 (%difference 1.8%; Cohen’s d = 0.3) and float session-2 (%difference 0.5%; Cohen’s d = 0.1). Stage I sleep values were similar to float session-1 (%difference 1.9%; Cohen’s d = 0.4) and float session-2 (%difference 4.3%; Cohen’s d = 1.0). Stage II sleep values differed from float session-1 (%difference 21.5%; Cohen’s d = 4.3) and float session-2 (%difference 19.6%; Cohen’s d = 4.0). Stages III–IV sleep values differed from float session-1 (%difference 46.5%; Cohen’s d = 5.6) and float session-2 (%difference 45.2%; Cohen’s d = 5.4). Bispectral Index™ values during flotation were comparable to those found in stage I sleep and nadir values described with other relaxation-induction techniques.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-017-2947-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Research on Nature of Science (NOS) conceptions and identity development for NOS contains a gap in the realm of examining doctoral students aiming to be science teacher educators. This research examines the NOS identity development of participants in a course focused on the philosophy of science and research about NOS education. The data analyzed for this study were recordings and notes taken during class discussions in a NOS seminar, as well as NOS research and teaching assignments associated with the course. These data sources were analyzed for development of four influences on identity development for NOS: 1) personal influences on NOS identity, 2) contextual influences on NOS identity, 3) competing identities with NOS, and 4) persistence in overcoming barriers to development of a NOS identity. Findings emphasize the need to target NOS identity development among teacher educators, as they hold the primary responsibility for instilling a NOS identity in their own students, who are future teachers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.