A reciprocal relationship between phosphorylation and O-glycosylation has been reported for many cellular processes and human diseases. The accumulated evidence points to the significant role these post-translational modifications play in aggregation and fibril formation. Simplified peptide model systems provide a means for investigating the molecular changes associated with protein aggregation. In this study, by using an amyloid-forming model peptide, we show that phosphorylation and glycosylation can affect folding and aggregation kinetics differently. Incorporation of phosphoserines, regardless of their quantity and position, turned out to be most efficient in preventing amyloid formation, whereas O-glycosylation has a more subtle effect. The introduction of a single beta-galactose does not change the folding behavior of the model peptide, but does alter the aggregation kinetics in a site-specific manner. The presence of multiple galactose residues has an effect similar to that of phosphorylation.

Molecular mobility has attracted considerable attention in supramolecular chemistry and biochemistry, but the simple question of whether a small molecule can move directly between different binding sites of a multitopic host without intermediate dissociation has not been addressed so far. To study such processes, we consider hydrogen/deuterium exchange experiments on a model system comprising complexes formed between 18-crown-6 and oligolysine peptides. Because direct binding-site hopping is indistinguishable in solution from a dissociation/reassociation mechanism, here we show that the high vacuum of a mass spectrometer offers a unique environment for probing such processes. The highly dynamic motion of crown ethers along oligolysine peptide chains proceeds mechanistically by a simultaneous transfer of the crown ether from its ammonium ion binding site to a nearby amino group together with a proton. Furthermore, the exchange experiments unambiguously reveal the zwitterionic structure of the 18-crown-6/oligolysine complexes, highlighting the versatility and potential of gas-phase experiments for investigating non-covalent interactions.

Amyloid formation plays a causative role in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease or Parkinson's disease. Soluble peptides form β-sheets that subsequently rearrange into fibrils and deposit as amyloid plaques. Many parameters trigger and influence the onset of the β-sheet formation. Early stages are recently discussed to be cell-toxic. Aiming at understanding various triggers such as interactions with hydrophobic-hydrophilic interfaces and metal ion complexation and their interplay, we investigated a set of model peptides at the air-water interface. We are using a general approach to a variety of diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and type II diabetes that are connected to amyloid formation. Surface sensitive techniques combined with film balance measurements have been used to assess the conformation of the peptides and their orientation at the air-water interface (IR reflection-absorption spectroscopy). Additionally, the structures of the peptide layers were characterized by grazing incidence X-ray diffraction and X-ray reflectivity. The peptides adsorb to the air-water interface and immediately adopt an α-helical conformation. This helical intermediate transforms into β-sheets upon further triggering. The factors that result in β-sheet formation are dependent on the peptide sequence. In general, the interface has the strongest effect on peptide conformation compared to high concentrations or metal ions. Metal ions are able to prevent aggregation in bulk but not at the interface. At the interface, metal ion complexation has only minor effects on the peptide secondary structure, influencing the in-plane structure that is formed in two dimensions. At the air-water interface, increased concentrations or a parallel arrangement of the α-helical intermediates are the most effective triggers. This study reveals the role of various triggers for β-sheet formation and their complex interplay. Our main finding is that the hydrophobic-hydrophilic interface largely governs the conformation of peptides. Therefore, the present study implies that special care is needed when interpreting data that may be affected by different amounts or types of interfaces during experimentation.

No abstract

No abstract