The WHO 2020 global TB Report estimates that in 2019 there were an estimated 500,000 cases of multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB) of which only 186,772 MDR-TB cases were diagnosed, and positive treatment outcomes were achieved in 57% of them. These data highlight the need for accelerating and improving MDR-TB screening, diagnostic, treatment and patient follow-up services. The last decade has seen three new TB drugs being licensed; bedaquiline, delamanid and pretomanid, and combinations these new, existing and repurposed drugs are leading to improved cure rates. The all oral six month WHO regimen for MDR-TB is more tolerable, has higher treatment success rates and lower mortality. However, the unprecedented ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is having major direct and indirect negative impacts on health services overall, including national TB programs and TB services. This adds further to longstanding challenges for tackling MDR-TB such as cost, rollout of diagnostics and drugs, and implementation of latest WHO guidelines for MDR-TB. In light of COVID-19 disruption of TB services, it is anticipated the numbers of MDR-TB cases will rise in 2021 and 2022 and will affect treatment outcomes further. Investing more in development of new TB drugs and shorter MDR-TB treatment regimens is required in anticipation of emerging drug resistance to new TB drug regimens. There is an urgent need for protecting current investments in TB services, sustaining gains being made in TB control and accelerating roll out of TB diagnostic and treatment services.
This laboratory has previously reported a murine model of Serpulina hyodysenteriae infection in which mice fed a defined diet, Teklad 85420 (TD), developed caecal lesions more consistently than mice fed a conventional rodent chow (CRC). The objectives of the current studies were to characterise and compare the time of onset of lesions, the morphological nature and severity of lesions and the extent of colonisation by S. hyodysenteriae in mice fed the two diets. In the first of two experiments, 50 C3H/HeJ and 50 C3H/HeOuJ mice were fed either TD or CRC and then half of each group was infected with S. hyodysenteriae. Mice (n = 5) from each group were killed and examined on days, 1, 2, 4, 9 or 17 after infection. Each mouse was examined grossly and microscopically and assigned lesion scores based on lesion severity. The second experiment was designed in an identical way to the first, but had slightly smaller group sizes (n = 20). Mice (n = 4) were killed for necropsy at the same five time points after infection and their caeca were homogenised and examined by quantitative bacteriology with media selective for S. hyodysenteriae. There were no differences in any finding due to mouse strain. Group lesion scores over the entire experimental period were significantly higher in mice fed TD (mean total lesion index = 13) than in mice fed CRC (mean total lesion index = 8.8). Lesions were also temporally distributed in a significantly different manner in that they appeared earlier (day 1) and persisted longer in the TD-fed mice in comparison to CRC-fed mice. Furthermore, lesions of equivalent severity from each treatment group presented identical microscopic features. Finally, quantitative bacteriological results indicated that there was no significant difference in the number of cfu of S. hyodysenteriae isolated from mice fed TD and those fed CRC. These results demonstrate that the characteristic severe lesions associated with S. hyodysenteriae infection in mice can occur 1 day after oral challenge in mice fed Teklad diet 85420. Bacteriological results further indicate that the enhancement of lesion formation in this model is not due to any significant effect of the diet on numbers of spirochaetes in the caeca of infected mice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.