No abstract

Semantic Web technologies have been applied in educational settings for different purposes in recent years, with the type of application being mainly defined by the way in which knowledge is represented and exploited. The basic technology for knowledge representation in Semantic Web settings is the ontology, which represents a common, shareable and reusable view of a particular application domain. Ontologies can support different activities in educational settings such as organizing course contents, classifying learning objects or assessing learning levels. Consequently, ontologies can become a very useful tool from a pedagogical perspective. This paper focuses on two different experiences where Semantic Web technologies are used in educational settings, the difference between them lying in how knowledge is obtained and represented. On the one hand, the OeLE platform uses ontologies as a support for assessment processes. Such ontologies have to be designed and implemented in semantic languages apt to be used by OeLE. On the other hand, the ENSEMBLE project pursues the development of semantic web applications by creating specific knowledge representations drawn from user needs. Our paper is consequently going to offer an in-depth analysis of the role played by ontologies, showing how they can be used in different ways drawing a comparison between model patterns and examining the ways in which they can complement each other as well as their practical implications

One of the basic needs for any healthcare professional is to be able to access to clinical information of patients in an understandable and normalized way. The lifelong clinical information of any person supported by electronic means configures his/her Electronic Health Record (EHR). This information is usually distributed among several independent and heterogeneous systems that may be syntactically or semantically incompatible. The Dual Model architecture has appeared as a new proposal for maintaining a homogeneous representation of the EHR with a clear separation between information and knowledge. Information is represented by a Reference Model which describes common data structures with minimal semantics. Knowledge is specified by archetypes, which are formal representations of clinical concepts built upon a particular Reference Model. This kind of architecture is originally thought for implantation of new clinical information systems, but archetypes can be also used for integrating data of existing and not normalized systems, adding at the same time a semantic meaning to the integrated data. In this paper we explain the possible use of a Dual Model approach for semantic integration and standardization of heterogeneous clinical data sources and present LinkEHR-Ed, a tool for developing archetypes as elements for integration purposes. LinkEHR-Ed has been designed to be easily used by the two main participants of the creation process of archetypes for clinical data integration: the Health domain expert and the Information Technologies domain expert.

We present the mapping and data transformation capabilities of LinkEHR-Ed, a visual tool to construct formal definitions of medical concepts in the form of archetypes which can be defined on the basis on multiple electronic health record architecture such as ISO 13606. With LinkEHR-Ed, users can enrich archetypes with mapping information which captures the relationship between relational or XML data sources and archetype structures. This mapping information is then analyzed and compiled into an XQuery expression that transforms source instances into an XML document. The target document satisfies the constraints imposed by the archetype and at the same time is compliant with the underlying electronic health record architecture.