[Purpose] To evaluate the effects of Pilates on patients with chronic low back pain
through a systematic review of high-quality articles on randomized controlled trials.
[Subjects and Methods] Keywords and synonyms for “Pilates” and “Chronic low back pain”
were used in database searches. The databases included PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence
Database (PEDro), Medline, and the Cochrane Library. Articles involving randomized
controlled trials with higher than 5 points on the PEDro scale were reviewed for
suitability and inclusion. The methodological quality of the included randomized
controlled trials was evaluated using the PEDro scale. Relevant information was extracted
by 3 reviewers. [Results] Eight randomized controlled trial articles were included.
Patients with chronic low back pain showed statistically significant improvement in pain
relief and functional ability compared to patients who only performed usual or routine
health care. However, other forms of exercise were similar to Pilates in the improvement
of pain relief and functional capacity. [Conclusion] In patients with chronic low back
pain, Pilates showed significant improvement in pain relief and functional enhancement.
Other exercises showed effects similar to those of Pilates, if waist or torso movement was
included and the exercises were performed for 20 cumulative hours.
BackgroundMore than 1000 scientific papers have been devoted to flatfoot issue. However, a bimodal distribution of flatfoot indices in school-aged children has never been discovered. The purposes of this study were to establish a new classification of flatfoot by characteristic in frequency distribution of footprint index and to endue the classification with discrepancy in physical fitness.Methods/Principal FindingsIn a longitudinal survey of physical fitness and body structure, weight bearing footprints and 3 physical fitness related tests were measured in 1228 school-aged children. Frequency distribution of initial data was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality and a unique bimodal distribution of footprint index was identified. The frequency distribution of footprint index manifests two distinct modes, flatfoot and non-flatfoot, by deconvolution and bootstrapping procedures. A constant intersection value of 1.0 in Staheli's arch index and 0.6 in Chippaux-Smirak index could distinguish the two modes of children, and the value was constant in different age, sex, and weight status. The performance of the one leg balance was inferior in flatfoot girls (median, 4.0 seconds in flatfoot girls vs. 4.3 seconds in non-flatfoot girls, p = 0.04, 95% CI 0.404–0.484).DiscussionThe natural bimodality lends itself to a flatfoot classification. Bimodality suggests development of the child's foot arch would be a leap from one state to another, rather than a continuous growth as body height and weight. The underlying dynamics of the human foot arch and motor development will trigger research prospects.
Two methods have been used to produce a maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) of the superficial quadriceps femoris muscles for normalization of electromyographic (EMG) data. The purposes of this study were to compare the myoelectic activity of MVIC of manual muscle testing (MMT) versus Cybex maximal isometric testing. Eighteen normal subjects were recruited. MMT and Cybex testing for MVIC of the dominant leg were performed. EMG activities of the vastus medialis, vastus lateralis and rectus femoris were recorded during MMT and Cybex trials. EMG amplitude and median frequency obtained from the two methods (MMT and Cybex testing) were used for statistical analysis of these three muscles. Statistically, the difference in the mean of the EMG signal amplitude and median frequency between MMT and Cybex testing were not significant. Considering cost and time, MMT for MVIC technique appears to be reliable and highly valuable.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.