Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common disease and lumbar discectomy is the most common surgical procedure carried out for patients with low back pain and leg symptoms. Although most researchers are focusing on the surgical techniques during operation, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of local intervertebral lavage during microdiscectomy.In this retrospective study, 410 patients were operated on by microdiscectomy for LDH during 2011 to 2014. Retrospectively, 213 of them (group A) accepted local intervertebral irrigation with saline water before wound closure and 197 patients (group B) only had their operative field irrigated with saline water. Systematic records of visual analog scores (VAS), Oswestry disability Index (ODI) questionnaire scale scores, use of analgesia, and hospital length of stay were done after hospitalization.The majority (80.49%) of the cases were diagnosed with lumber herniation at the levels of L4/5 and L5/S1. Fifty-one patients had herniations at 2 levels. There were significant decreases of VAS scores and ODI in both groups between preoperation and postoperation of different time points. VAS scores decreased more in group A than group B at early stage of postoperation follow-up. However, there were no statistically significant differences between 2 groups in using analgesia, VAS and ODI up to 1 month of follow-up.Microdiscectomy for LDH offers a marked improvement in back and radicular pain. Local irrigation of herniated lumber disc area could relief dick herniation-derived low back pain and leg radicular pain at early stage of post-operation. However, the pain relief of this intervention was not noticeable for a long period.

Introduction The aim of this study was to explore the association between sagittal spinopelvic alignment and persistent low back pain (PLBP) following posterior decompression and instrumented fusion for mild L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. Methods By retrieving medical records from January 2015 to April 2020, 200 patients following PLIF for mild L5-S1 spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: PLBP group and non-PLBP group. The baseline characteristics and radiographic parameters were analyzed and compared between groups. Results The PLBP group comprised 26 patients, and the non-PLBP group comprised 174 patients. No significant differences in preoperative spinopelvic parameters were found between the two groups ( p > 0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative variations of LL, SL, LSA, SD, and HOD spinopelvic parameters, regardless of group ( p < 0.05). Postoperative PT and SS differed significantly between the PLBP group and non-PLBP group ( p < 0.05). In the PLBP group, there were no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative PT; the same applied to SS. However, significant differences were found for the variations in preoperative and postoperative PT and SS between the two groups. The ΔPT was found as an independent risk factor for postoperative PLBP. Conclusion Patients with mild L5-S1 spondylolisthesis with PLBP after posterior lumbar spinal fusion had decreased SS and increased PT.