No abstract

ObjectiveTo analyze the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of patients with squamous cell carcinoma localized to different supraglottic subregions.MethodsClinicopathologic data were reviewed retrospectively for 111 patients with supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma who were diagnosed between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2005 and were initially treated with surgery. DNA from human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and (or /and) HPV 18 were detected in all the 111 supraglottic carcinoma specimens using in situ hybridization. Survival analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, factors were compared using log-rank test, and prognostic factors were determined using Cox proportional hazards model. The relationship between subregions and clinicopathologic factors was analyzed using Chi-square tests.ResultsHPV prevalence differed between patients with aryepiglottic fold carcinoma and ventricle carcinoma (P < .05). The local-regional control rates, overall survival rates or cancer specific survival rates were significantly different between different subregions. Univariate analysis indicated that pTNM classification, pN spread, and subregion were associated with prognosis (P < .05). Multivariate analysis indicated that pTNM classification and subregion were associated with supraglottic carcinoma prognosis. The survival rate was better for patients with carcinoma of the epiglottis or ventricular bands compared to those with carcinoma in the aryepiglottic fold or ventricle (P = .012).ConclusionsSubregion may be a new prognostic factor for supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma. Different supraglottic carcinoma subregions have distinct clinical features such as HPV expression, lymph node metastasis rate, local-regional control and prognosis. Therefore, it is necessary to subdivide supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas into several subregion groups to individualize therapy.

Objective To analyze the pattern of lymph node (LN) metastasis and its effect on prognosis in sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM). Methods This retrospective study was conducted based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program data. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors were compared between groups using log-rank test and Fisher’s exact test, and prognostic factors were screened using the Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to examine the treatment differences after accounting for sex, age, race, T stage, N stage, and M stage. Results Level I (57.1%) and level II (53.6%) nodes were the most common sites of lymph node metastasis, followed by level III (17.9%) and IV (17.9%) nodes. T stage, M stage, and tumor size were associated with LN metastasis. The 5-year overall survival rates for patients without and with LN metastasis were 35.2% and 5.3%, respectively. Conclusions Level I and II lymph nodes may be the sentinel nodes of SNMM, Advanced T stage and increasing tumor size could promote LN metastasis. LN metastasis may promote distant metastasis and remains an important prognostic factor for patients with SNMM.

No abstract

No abstract