Environmental pollution and income inequality are important issues related to sustainable economic and social development. Air pollution affects residents' physical health, and income inequality affects social stability and economic development. No scholar has yet confirmed the causal impact of air pollution on income inequality; therefore, this study is an important extension of the environmental Kuznets curve theory. This article examines the impact using balanced panel data from 156 countries (2004-2017) and applies the spatial Durbin model to analyze the mechanism of air pollution's impact on income inequality from the perspective of public health. The results prove the following. First, increasing air pollution does increase income inequality. Second, the spatial spillover effect of air pollution constitutes a relatively important part of the total effect of air pollution on income inequality compared with the direct effect. Third, general government public-health expenditures are an important transmission channel by which air pollution affects income inequality. The conclusions of the research have some important policy implications for environmental governance and income distribution policies at the national as well as supranational level.

Air pollution has an important impact on both human health and sustainable economic development. The relationship of the current account, which is an important carrier of international economic activity, with air pollution has rarely been discussed by scholars. This paper aims to investigate how air pollution affects the current account and the mechanism of this effect. We conducted a theoretical analysis of the relationship between air pollution and the current account by adopting an extended form of the life-cycle model. Then, we used panel data (2000-2017) from 159 countries and the panel double fixed-effect method to empirically test the theoretical outcomes. We found that an increase in the degree of air pollution in a country leads to the deterioration of the domestic current account. In addition, air pollution changes the current account by affecting the demographic structure, following the "air pollution→demographic structure→current account" mechanism. The study also tested the robustness of the benchmark results by solving endogeneity problems, subsample regression and controlling measurement errors. Our findings are an important expansion and innovation for the research about the current account and have important implications for external economic equilibrium and sustainable economic development.