Watermelon is one of the major Cucurbitaceae crops and the recent availability of genome sequence greatly facilitates the fundamental researches on it. Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT–PCR) is the preferred method for gene expression analyses, and using validated reference genes for normalization is crucial to ensure the accuracy of this method. However, a systematic validation of reference genes has not been conducted on watermelon. In this study, transcripts of 15 candidate reference genes were quantified in watermelon using qRT–PCR, and the stability of these genes was compared using geNorm and NormFinder. geNorm identified ClTUA and ClACT, ClEF1α and ClACT, and ClCAC and ClTUA as the best pairs of reference genes in watermelon organs and tissues under normal growth conditions, abiotic stress, and biotic stress, respectively. NormFinder identified ClYLS8, ClUBCP, and ClCAC as the best single reference genes under the above experimental conditions, respectively. ClYLS8 and ClPP2A were identified as the best reference genes across all samples. Two to nine reference genes were required for more reliable normalization depending on the experimental conditions. The widely used watermelon reference gene 18SrRNA was less stable than the other reference genes under the experimental conditions. Catalase family genes were identified in watermelon genome, and used to validate the reliability of the identified reference genes. ClCAT1and ClCAT2 were induced and upregulated in the first 24 h, whereas ClCAT3 was downregulated in the leaves under low temperature stress. However, the expression levels of these genes were significantly overestimated and misinterpreted when 18SrRNA was used as a reference gene. These results provide a good starting point for reference gene selection in qRT–PCR analyses involving watermelon.
The effect of B. subtilis on growth performance of broilers was evaluated and the relationship between growth and caecal microbiota was revealed. The results of this study help to promote application of probiotics in poultry industry.
Summary In the present study, Bacillus subtilis Ch9 was evaluated as a probiotic in grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idella (Valenciennes, 1844). For 56 days the grass carp (50 ± 2.5 g) were given a feed containing B. subtilis Ch9 in three concentrations: 1.0 × 109 (T1), 3.0 × 109 (T2) and 5.0 × 109 (T3) CFU kg−1 feed in triplicate treatments. The control group (T0) was given feed without B. subtilis Ch9 for the same period. Determined were the specific growth rate (SGR), feed conversion ratio (FCR), and digestive enzyme activities in the intestine and hepatopancreas as well as the intestinal microflora. After 56 days, fish receiving the diets supplemented with B. subtilis Ch9 showed significantly higher SGR and lower FCR (P < 0.05) than those fed the control diet. There was no significant different in SGR and FCR among T1, T2 and T3 nor was the survival rate affected (P > 0.05) by the dietary treatments. From days 14 to 56 of the experiment, higher protease, amylase and lipase activities in the foregut, midgut hindgut and hepatopancreas were observed in T1, T2 and T3 (P < 0.05) compared with the control over a short‐term (14–28 days). Enzyme activity did not increase after long‐term feeding with B. subtilis Ch9 (56 days), but was still higher than that of control fish (P < 0.05). Fish fed the probiotic had an increase in trend of total aerobic and facultative anaerobic bacterial quantity (P > 0.05), but the ratio of Bacillus was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in control fish. The total anaerobic bacterial quantity, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in fish fed B. subtilis Ch9 compared with fish fed control feed. In conclusion, an optimum dose of B. subtilis Ch9 could modulate intestinal microflora, induce digestive enzyme activity and potentially promote the digestion and absorption of nutrients, as well as improve the growth performance of grass carp significantly.
Melon (Cucumis melo. L) is not only an economically important cucurbitaceous crop but also an attractive model for studying many biological characteristics. Screening appropriate reference genes is essential to reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR), which is key to many studies involving gene expression analysis. In this study, 14 candidate reference genes were selected, and the variations in their expression in roots and leaves of plants subjected to biotic stress, abiotic stress, and plant growth regulator treatment were assessed by RT-qPCR. The stability of the expression of the selected genes was determined and ranked using geNorm and NormFinder. geNorm identified the two most stable genes for each set of conditions: CmADP and CmUBIep across all samples, CmUBIep and CmRPL in roots, CmRAN and CmACT in leaves, CmADP and CmRPL under abiotic stress conditions, CmTUA and CmACT under biotic stress conditions, and CmRAN and CmACT under plant growth regulator treatments. NormFinder determined CmRPL to be the best reference gene in roots and under biotic stress conditions and CmADP under the other experimental conditions. CmUBC2 and CmPP2A were not found to be suitable under many experimental conditions. The catalase family genes CmCAT1, CmCAT2, and CmCAT3 were identified in melon genome and used as target genes to validate the reliability of identified reference genes. The catalase family genes showed the most upregulation 3 days after inoculation with Fusarium wilt in roots, after which they were downregulated. Their levels of expression were significantly overestimated when the unsuitable reference gene was used for normalization. These results not only provide guidelines for the selection of reference genes for gene expression analyses in melons but may also provide valuable information for studying the functions of catalase family genes in stress responses.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.