The high proportion of Bronze Age metalwork found in the Thames has aroused interest for many years, but all too little is known of the circumstances in which this material was deposited. Much of it is weaponry, but there are finds of tools as well. This paper examines the material found upstream of Teddington and considers its treatment before it entered the river. A high proportion of the artefacts had been used and some of them deliberately destroyed. There are marked variations in the selection and treatment of these artefacts along different lengths of the river and in different periods of the Bronze Age, but it seems likely that the proportion of fine metalwork that was deliberately damaged before it entered the river increased sharply over time. Recovery methods and documentationMost river metalwork was recovered by dredging, and some was found during the building of locks, bridges and riverside structures or brought to museums as stray finds.

No abstract

This study examined the relationship between dentofacial appearance and judgments of facial attractiveness in a sample of 60 subjects between ages 65 and 75. Subjects completed questionnaires regarding their current dental appearance and level of satisfaction with their facial attractiveness. Subjects then viewed and ranked four sets of five photographs that had been digitally manipulated to simulate common dental defects. Regardless of background facial attractiveness or gender of stimulus photographs, a specific ranking order for dental defects emerged with rank-order correlations in the 90% range. Findings suggest that dental appearance affects judgments of facial attractiveness regardless of gender or background facial attractiveness.

The aims of this study were to categorize and analyze the most frequent patient complaints at the Rutgers School of Dental Medicine (RSDM) clinic in an effort to identify areas in need of improvement. A retrospective review of patient complaints reported to the RSDM Office for Clinical Affairs from July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2015 was conducted. A total of 148 unduplicated patients were selected for evaluation because they made at least one official complaint. In total, 193 patient complaints were made during this period. A published complaint taxonomy was used to categorize RSDM patient complaints into domains, categories, and subcategories, highlighting frequent issues of complaint. Of the 193 complaints made, 256 issues were identified. The results showed that the most frequent domain of complaint was Management, followed by Clinical, then Relationships. Institutional Issues and Quality were the most recurring categories coded. Of the 26 subcategories, nearly 70% of the complaints were coded into one of four: Finance and Billing, Delays, Patient Journey, and Quality of Care. While the results were effective in identifying broad areas of improvement, there were limitations to using the traditional taxonomy in the dental school setting. Based on these data, the RSDM Patient Complaint Taxonomy, specific to the needs of a dental school environment, was created in an effort to gain increased specificity and further enhance quality improvement measures. It is the hope of the research team that this tool will be used across dental schools, opening the door for future collaborations and ultimately improving patient care.

Access to oral health care for vulnerable populations is one of the concerns addressed by the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration HIV/AIDS Bureau's Community-Based Dental Partnership Program (CBDPP). The program introduces dental students and residents at several dental schools to care for vulnerable patients through didactic and clinical work in community-based dental settings. This study of the dental students and residents in this program answered three questions: 1) What are their HIV knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors? 2) How has participation in the CBDPP impacted their knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors? 3) Has the intervention affected their work placement decisions and attitudes after graduation, particularly with respect to treating people living with HIV and other underserved populations? A total of 305 irst-through fourth-year dental students and irst-and second-year residents at ive dental schools across the United States completed surveys before and after a community-based rotation and following graduation. Response rates at each of the ive schools ranged from 82.4 to 100 percent. The results showed an increase in the participants' knowledge and positive attitudes regarding treatment for patients with HIV and other vulnerable populations post-rotation compared to pre-rotation. Results after graduation found that most respondents were practicing in private settings or in academic institutions as residents but were willing to treat a diverse patient population. These indings support the role of training programs, such as the CBDPP, for expanding the dental workforce to treating vulnerable populations including people living with HIV/AIDS.