PurposeTo evaluate the clinical factors that impact ureteral stent-related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after ureteroscopic ureterolithotomy, including the stent position and medication.Materials and MethodsFifty-three patients who underwent ureteroscopic ureterolithotomy with indwelling a stent were distributed into three groups. On demand analgesics were given to the group 1 (n=18). Daily tamsulosin 0.2 mg was added for group 2 (n=15) and daily tamsulosin 0.2 mg and tolterodine 4 mg was added for group 3 (n=20). The patients were also subclassified into appropriate or inappropriate group according to stent position. All the patients completed a visual analogue scale (VAS) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) on the 1st and 7th postoperative days. The VAS and IPSS were analyzed according to the medication groups and the stent position.ResultsIn the appropriate stent potion group, only the storage symptom scores of groups 2 and 3 on the 1st postoperative day were significantly lower than those of the group 1 (p=0.001). This medication effect on LUTS was not observed in the inappropriate stent position group. In this group, total IPSS (p=0.015) and storage symptom scores (p=0.002) were higher than in the appropriate stent position group on the 7th postoperative day.ConclusionsCorrect placement of the stent was more important than medication for lessening stent-related storage symptoms.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the relationship between prostate specific antigen (PSA) and prostate volume (PV) in Korean men, as PV is a key predictor of both disease progression and response to medical therapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and PSA has been suggested as a proxy marker to estimate the total PV, mainly in Caucasians. PATIENTS AND METHODS From 1999 to 2004, men aged 50–79 years with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and BPH were enrolled into this multicentre study. The analyses included 5716 patients presenting to 11 medical centres with LUTS (International Prostate Symptom Score >8, peak urinary flow rate <15 mL/s); they had a mean age of 64.3 years, mean baseline PV of 36.9 mL, and mean baseline PSA level of 2.2 ng/mL. Men with a baseline PSA of >10 ng/mL were excluded, to reduce the likelihood of including occult prostate cancer. A biopsy was taken in those with suspicious findings on a digital rectal examination or serum PSA level of >4 ng/mL, to exclude prostate cancer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to evaluate the ability of serum PSA to predict threshold PV in men with BPH RESULTS The PV and serum PSA level had an age‐dependent log‐linear relationship, the strength of which increased with age. The ROC curve analysis showed that PSA had good predictive value for various prostate volume thresholds (30, 40 and 50 mL). CONCLUSIONS The PSA‐PV relationship in Korean men is similar to that in Caucasians, but Korean men have a slightly lower PSA level and a smaller PV than Caucasians. The approximate age‐specific criteria for detecting Korean men with a PV of >40 mL were a PSA level of >1.3 ng/mL, >1.7 ng/mL and >2.0 ng/mL for men with BPH in their sixth, seventh and eighth decade, respectively.

PurposeThe aim of this study was to evaluate the recent changes in the clinicopathologic features of prostate cancer in Korea and to compare these features with those of Western populations.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 1582 men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer between 1995 and 2007 at 10 institutions in Korea for comparison with Western studies. The patients were divided into two groups in order to evaluate the recent clinicopathological changes in prostate cancer: Group 1 had surgery between 1995 and 2003 (n=280) and Group 2 had surgery between 2004 and 2007 (n=1302). The mean follow-up period was 24 months.ResultsGroup 1 had a higher prostate-specific antigen level than Group 2 (10.0 ng/mL vs. 7.5 ng/mL, respectively; p<0.001) and a lower proportion of biopsy Gleason scores ≤6 (35.0% vs. 48.1%, respectively; p<0.001). The proportion of patients with clinical T1 stage was higher in Group 2 than in Group 1. Group 1 had a lower proportion of organ-confined disease (59.6% vs. 68.6%; p<0.001) and a lower proportion of Gleason scores ≤6 (21.3% vs. 33.0%; p<0.001), compared to Group 2. However, the relatively higher proportion of pathologic Gleason scores ≤6 in Group 2 was still lower than those of Western men, even though the proportion of organ-confined disease reached to that of Western series.ConclusionKorean men with prostate cancer currently present better clinicopathologic parameters. However, in comparison, Korean men still show relatively worse pathologic Gleason scores than Western men.

PurposeTo identify potential predictive factors of incidental prostate cancer (IPca) in patients considering tissue-ablation treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Materials and MethodsFrom the 11 centers, 1,613 men who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or open prostatectomy were included. Before surgery, prostate biopsy was performed in all patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥4.0 ng/ml or with abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) findings. The patients with prostate cancer preoperatively or with PSA >20 ng/ml were excluded. As predictive factors of IPca, age, body mass index, PSA, DRE, and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) findings, including total prostate volume (TPV), transition zone volume (TZV), and the presence of hypoechoic lesions, were reviewed. PSA density (PSAD) and PSAD in the transition zone (PSAD-TZV) were calculated.ResultsIPca was diagnosed in 78 patients (4.8%). DRE findings, PSA, and TZV were independent predictive factors in the multivariate analysis. In the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of PSA, PSAD, and PSAD-TZV, the area under the curve (AUC) was the largest for PSAD-TZV (AUC, 0.685).ConclusionsIPca was detected in 4.8% of the population studied. In addition to DRE findings, the combination of TZV and PSA can be useful predictive factors of IPca in patients considering tissue-ablation treatment as well as TURP.

No abstract