Purpose:
To analyze the trends of glaucoma surgery procedures over the past 5 years among hospitals across major provinces in China.
Materials and Methods:
This was a retrospective observational study based on medical records. We obtained the annual numbers of commonly performed glaucoma incisional surgeries from 57 hospitals of 30 provincial regions in the Chinese Glaucoma Study Consortium (CGSC) from January 2015 to September 2019. The trend of glaucoma surgery was analyzed by Cochrane-Armitage trend test.
Results:
Trabeculectomy, cataract extraction combined with goniosynechialysis, cataract extraction combined with trabeculectomy, and surgical peripheral iridotomy (SPI) were the top 4 surgical procedures percentages of which have the most substantial change over the course of 2015 to 2019 (all P
trend <0.001). Numbers of trabeculectomies decreased significantly from 47.59% in 2015 to 31.21% in 2019; cataract extraction combined with goniosynechialysis increased from 12.12% to 28.48%; cataract extraction combined with trabeculectomy increased from 13.11% to 15.97%; and SPI decreased from 9.03% to 6.34%. The proportion of internal drainage surgery increased from 24.31% in 2015 to 39.29% in 2019 while external drainage surgery decreased from 69.20% to 54.64% (All P
trend <0.001). The microinvasive glaucoma surgeries including AB-interno Canaloplasty, gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy, and Trabectome, increased from 0.62% to 1.40% (P
trend<0.001). Across all study hospitals, the trends were similar, except for the Tibet Autonomous Region Eye Center, where SPI and trabeculectomy remained the most common anti-glaucoma surgeries.
Conclusion:
In the past 5 years, we observed substantial reduction in trabeculectomy, and increase in combination cataract-glaucoma procedures across major hospitals in China. The proportion of internal drainage surgery increased, while external drainage surgery decreased significantly. Detailed understanding of shifting trends in glaucoma surgeries can facilitate better health care resource allocation and training of glaucoma subspecialists in China.
PurposeTo assess the optimal number and orientation of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) images for accurately measuring ocular biometric parameters in angle closure eyes.MethodsSubjects with angle closure, defined as >3 quadrants of non-visible pigmented trabecular meshwork on static gonioscopy, were selected from the Chinese American Eye Study. Mean angle opening distance (AOD500) was calculated using four images (0°−180°, 45°−225°, 90°−270° and 135°−315° meridians) from one eye per subject. Ten eyes from each quartile of AOD500 measurements were randomly selected for detailed 32-image analysis of 10 biometric parameters, including AOD500, iris curvature (IC), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens vault (LV), and anterior chamber area (ACA). Mean and range of measurements from 1, 2, 4, 8 or 16 images were compared with 32-image values for all parameters.Results40 out of 335 eyes with angle closure were selected for 32-image analysis. Deviation from the 32-image mean was between 0.44% and 19.31% with one image, decreasing to 0.08% to 4.21% with two images for all parameters. Deviation from the 32-image range of measurements was between 54.67% to 88.94% with one image, decreasing to <7.00% with eight images for all parameters except ACD and ACA. Orienting the first image analysed along the 25°−205° meridian better approximated the range of measurements when four or fewer images were analysed.ConclusionsSectoral anatomical variations in angle closure eyes are easily misrepresented based on current AS-OCT imaging conventions. A revised multi-image approach can better capture the mean and range of biometric measurements.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.