Background: Small nucleolar RNA host gene 17 (SNHG17), a novel cancer-related long noncoding RNA (lncRNA), was reported to be responsible for processing and developing in several cancers. Nonetheless, the clinical significance and biological function of SNHG17 in human breast cancer (BC) remain rarely known. Materials and methods: 58 pairs of BC tissues and adjacent non-cancerous tissues were harvested to measure SNHG17 expression levels. SNHG17 was knockdown to study its biological behavior in BC cells. The microRNAs (miR-NAs) that can bind to SNHG17 were predicated using Starbase2.0 and were tested using luciferase reporter activity and RIP assays. A xenograft model was established to investigate the impact of SNHG17 in tumor growth in vivo. Results: An increased SNHG17 was observed in BC samples and cell lines compared with corresponding control. Increased SNHG17 was closely associated with poor prognosis.SNHG17 depletion suppressed cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro, as well as inhibited tumor growth in xenograft tumor models. Mechanistically, SNHG17 could function as an endogenous sponge of miR-124-3p in BC cells. Moreover, the repression of cell proliferation, migration and invasion induced by SNHG17 knockdown would reversed by miR-124-3p inhibitor. Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the lncRNASNHG17 could regulate the progression of BC by sponging miR-124-3p.

Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Here, we report the prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations in patients with high‐risk breast cancer from Inner Mongolia and Jilin, China, which was a part of a nationwide project on the detection of BRCA1/2 mutations in Chinese patients with hereditary breast cancer. Methods According to the criteria, index patients from a total of 245 independent families were initially recruited. All 49 exons of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and adjacent noncoding regions were screened for mutations based on next‐generation sequencing from collected saliva. Results We detected 17 BRCA1/2 variants in 18 of 216 (8.3%) index patients with high‐risk breast cancer. Among these, seven mutations were novel, including four BRCA1 mutations (c.123_124delCAinsAT, c.5093_5096delCTAA, c.5396‐2A>G, and c.2054delinsGAAGAGTAACAAGTAAGAAGAGTAACAAGAAG), and three BRCA2 mutations (c.304A>T, c.7552_7553insT, and c.9548_9549insA). The BRCA1/2 variants were identified in 14% (8/57) of the patients with triple‐negative breast cancer and in 6.3% (10/159) of the patients with non‐triple‐negative breast cancer. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.07). A higher frequency for BRCA1 mutations was observed in patients with triple‐negative breast cancer than in those with non‐triple‐negative breast cancer (12.3% vs. 2.5%, p = 0.004). The frequencies of the BRCA2 mutations were not significantly different between patients with triple‐negative breast cancer and those with non‐triple‐negative breast cancer (1.8% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.46). Conclusion We found that patients with triple‐negative breast cancer had a higher frequency of BRCA1 mutations than those with non‐triple‐negative breast cancer. In this study, no significant associations between the BRCA1/2 mutation status and age, family history of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer and prostate cancer, number of primary lesions, tumor size, or lymph node metastasis were observed.

Rationale: Adenomyoepithelioma (AME) is a rare biphasic tumor consisting of epithelial and Myoepithelial cell. Most of the AME is benign, and only a few will progress to malignancy, Here, we report a case of low-grade malignant adenomyoepithelioma, and review the related literature, in a bid to investigate its clinical and pathological features and thus, enhance our understanding of this tumor. Patient concerns: A 64-year-old woman visited our hospital with a 1-year history of a painless mass in her left breast. Physical examination revealed a palpable painless mass, measuring approximately 4.5 cm, in the left breast. Diagnosis: Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of malignant adenomyoepithelioma Interventions: The patient underwent local excision of the mass, with frozen section analysis revealing ductal carcinoma in situ. Mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy were then performed. Outcomes: We conducted a one-year follow-up, and relapse was not observed. Lessons: Treatment of AME remains controversial owing to the lack of high volume data and absence of prospective studies. Simple mastectomy is an acceptable treatment of this tumor.

Rationale: Mammary hamartoma is a rare benign breast tumor, composed of ducts, lobules, fibers, and adipose tissue. We describe a mammary hamartoma in a man; this is the fourth case being reported in the literature.Patient concerns: A 30-year-old man presented with a 1-month history of a painless mass in his right breast.Diagnosis: Ultrasound imaging and mammography revealed a lesion, approximately 2.0 cm  2.0 cm in size, in the right breast, which was considered to be either a lipomyoma or an adenoma fibrosum.Interventions: The mass was surgically resected. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of mammary hamartoma.Outcomes: The patient was discharged from the hospital after surgery. There was no sign of reoccurrence during a 1-year followup period.Lessons: At present, mammary hamartoma is considered to be a benign lesion, usually treated by surgical resection. Some reports have suggested a possible association between a hamartoma and the development of breast malignancy. The pathology and biology of an association between a mammary hamartoma and malignancy have not been defined to date.Abbreviations: T1W1 = T1-weighted magnetic resonance images, US = ultrasonography.