BackgroundAlthough immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are one of the most important treatments for advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), NSCLC patients with ALK-rearranged usually don’t obtain a clinical benefit. The reason may be related to the unique tumor microenvironment (TME). We evaluated the characteristics of immune biomarkers of the TME and their prognostic value in ALK-rearranged NSCLC.MethodsTumor samples from patients with ALK-rearranged (N = 39) and EGFR- (N = 40)/KRAS- (N = 30) mutated NSCLC were collected. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was used to assess the expression of 9 tumor immune markers as well as 6 immune markers of tumor-infiltrating cells. To research the TME of ALK-rearranged NSCLC, EGFR/KRAS-positive patients were used as controls. Furthermore, the correlation between the efficacy and prognosis of patients with advanced-stage (IIIC-IV) ALK rearrangements treated with targeted drugs was analyzed in terms of the TME.ResultsThe proportion of PD-L1+ tumors was lower in ALK-positive NSCLC than in KRAS-positive NSCLC. Besides, the proportion of T cells expressing TIM-3-CD8+ (15.38%), CTLA4-CD8+ (12.82%), LAG3-CD8+ (33.33%) and PD-1-CD8+ (2.56%) in ALK-positive NSCLC was lower than that in EGFR/KRAS-positive NSCLC. The expression of CD3, CD8 T cells and CD20 B cells was lower in ALK-positive NSCLC than in KRAS-positive NSCLC (p < 0.0001, < 0.005, and < 0.001, respectively). Nevertheless, the level of CD4 helper T cells was higher in ALK-positive NSCLC than in EGFR/KRAS-positive NSCLC (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively). The repression of TIM3 was higher in ALK-positive NSCLC than in KRAS-positive NSCLC (p < 0.001). In addition, our data showed that high expression of PD-L1 (HR = 0.177, 95% CI 0.038–0.852, p = 0.027) and CTLA4 (HR = 0.196, 95% CI 0.041–0.947, p = 0.043) was related to lower OS in advanced-stage ALK- rearranged NSCLC patients treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).ConclusionsImmunosuppressive status was characteristic of the TME in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC compared with EGFR/KRAS-positive NSCLC. High expression of PD-L1 and CTLA4 was an adverse prognostic factor in advanced-stage ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients treated with ALK-TKIs. Immunotherapy for ALK-rearranged patients requires further exploration and validation by clinical trials.

Integrins are involved in extracellular and intracellular signaling and are often aberrantly expressed in tumors. Integrin beta 2 (ITGB2) has previously been demonstrated to be correlated with the host defense. However, the expression profile and role of ITGB2 in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unclear. Here, we found that the genetic alterations in ITGB2 was predominated by gene mutation and copy number deletion using cBioPortal analysis, and its expression was downregulated in the NSCLC tissues, as validated by the UALCAN, TCGA, and GEO databases and our tissue samples. Kaplan–Meier (KM) plotter analysis revealed that patients with a lower ITGB2 expression had a shorter overall survival (OS) time (p = 0.01). Moreover, 1089 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the NSCLC tissues were screened using the TCGA database. The GO and KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs were closely associated with immune processes and cell adhesion. The protein–protein interaction (PPI) network revealed that 10 of 15 EMT-related genes among the DEGs might lead to the metastasis of NSCLC. Concomitantly, the expression of ITGB2 was positively correlated with the infiltration of Treg cells and Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). Biologically, the ectopic expression of ITGB2 significantly inhibited the proliferation and metastasis of NSCLC cells. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that ITGB2 suppressed the expression of N-cadherin, Vimentin, Slug, Snail, and Twist, while it promoted E-cadherin expression, according to gain-of-function studies. In conclusion, ITGB2 can inhibit the proliferation and migration of NSCLC cells, leading to a poor prognosis, via epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) signaling.

Savolitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor being developed for the treatment of metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) factor exon 14 skipping alterations. However, the role of savolitinib in neoadjuvant therapy for lung cancer remains unclear. Here, we present a case of a 65-year-old woman diagnosed with stage IIIA (cT2bN2M0, eighth TNM stage) upper right lung adenocarcinoma harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. After 4 weeks of therapy, a partial response was achieved with neoadjuvant savolitinib, and significant shrinkage in tumor and lymph nodes was observed. We also measured the immune microenvironment of the primary tumor pre- and posttreatment with savolitinib.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to explore the factors associated with the occurrence of ISP after VATS to reduce the incidence of ISP and improve patients' quality of life.MethodsThe data of patients were collected between June 2020 and August 2020 in the Department of Lung Cancer Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. The angle of upper arm was measured intraoperatively. The patient's postoperative shoulder function was quantified using the Constant-Murley shoulder function rating score. The proportional hazards model was applied to identify multiple influence factors.ResultsA total of 140 eligible patients met criteria. At postoperative day 3, only the age influenced patients' shoulder pain. At postoperative day 14, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.098 [1.046-1.152]; P < 0.001) and upper arm Angle A (OR: 1.064 [1.011-1.121]; P = 0.018) were independent risk factors for low shoulder function scores. However, height was its protective factor (OR: 0.923 [0.871-0.977]; P = 0.006). At postoperative day 42, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that age (OR: 1.079 [1.036-1.124]; P < 0.001) was a risk factor for low shoulder function scores, and height (OR: 0.933 [0.886-0.983]; P = 0.009) was its protective factor. In contrast, upper arm Angle B was not statistically associated with low shoulder function scores (P>0.05). In addition, the reduction in ipsilateral Shoulder scores after surgery was higher in patients with more than 113° of angle A (P = 0.025).ConclusionISP was closely related to the angle of anterior flexion of the upper arm on the patient's operative side intraoperatively. The increase in the degree of postoperative shoulder injury is more pronounced for an anterior flexion angle of >113°. Therefore, we recommend that the angle of anterior flexion of the upper extremity should be <113° intraoperatively.

No abstract