This study explored the different kinds of unintended learning in\ud
primary school practical science lessons. In this study, unintended\ud
learning has been defined as student learning that was found to\ud
occur that was not included in the teachers learning objectives for\ud
that specific lesson. A total of 22 lessons, taught by five teachers\ud
in Korean primary schools with 10- to 12-year-old students, were\ud
audio-and video recorded. Pre-lesson interviews with the teachers\ud
were conducted to ascertain their intended learning objectives.\ud
Students were asked to write short memos after the lesson about\ud
what they learnt. Post-lesson interviews with students and\ud
teachers were undertaken. What emerged was that there were\ud
three types of knowledge that students learnt unintentionally:\ud
factual knowledge gained by phenomenon-based reasoning,\ud
conceptual knowledge gained by relation- or model-based\ud
reasoning, and procedural knowledge acquired by practice. Most\ud
unintended learning found in this study fell into the factual\ud
knowledge and only a few cases of conceptual knowledge were\ud
found. Cases of both explicit procedural knowledge and implicit\ud
procedural knowledge were found. This study is significant in that\ud
it suggests how unintended learning in practical work can be\ud
facilitated as an educative opportunity for meaningful learning by\ud
exploring what and how students learnt
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.