A growth trial was conducted to feed juvenile tilapia (initial weight,9.1 AE 0.1g), Oreochromis niloticus  O. aureus, isonitrogenous diets for 8 weeks. Six diets were formulated containing 29% crude protein from casein and gelatin, 10% crude fat from soybean oil and re¢ned soybean lecithin and varying levels of corn starch ranging from 6% to 46% at increments of 8%, with corresponding energy to protein (E/P) ratios of 35.6, 37.9, 40.2, 42.5, 44.8 and 47.1kJ g À1 . Weight gain (WG), speci¢c growth rate, feed e⁄ciency ratio and protein e⁄ciency ratio were signi¢cantly higher in ¢sh fed diets with starch ! 22% (or E/P ratio ! 40.2 kJ g À1 ) than in ¢sh fed diets with 6% or 14% starch (or E/P ratio of 35.6 or 37.9 kJ g À1 ).No further improvement was measured when dietary starch content increased beyond 22%. Body protein retention showed the same general pattern as WG, and was highest in ¢sh fed the 22% starch diet. Body composition was signi¢cantly a¡ected by dietary starch level. Fish fed diets with starch ! 30% had signi¢cantly higher lipid content than ¢sh fed diets with 6% or 14% starch. Ash content was negatively correlated with starch inclusion level, but moisture and protein contents did not show discernible trends among treatments. Results indicate that hybrid tilapia can utilize 46% dietary starch without growth retardation, while 22% starch in feed for juvenile tilapia containing 29% protein and 10% lipid, or an E/P ratio of 37.9 kJ g À1 is optimal. à Di¡erent superscripts within each column indicate signi¢cant (Po0.05) di¡erences between ¢sh fed di¡erent diets.Aquaculture Research, 2005 Dietary carbohydrate level in juvenile tilapia Y Wang et al.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.