Fungal infections remain a major cause of treatment failure and death in acute leukemia. New liposomal preparations of amphotericin B are now available. While less toxic, their comparative efficacy and toxicity profiles are unknown. In this study the comparative efficacy and safety of ABLC vs. AmBisome was evaluated in seventy-five patients with leukemia who developed 82 episodes of suspected or documented mycosis, and were treated (1:1) with either ABLC (n=43) or AmBisome (n=39). Both drugs were dosed accordingly from 3 to 5 mg/kg/day. Using an intent-to-treat analysis, the overall response to therapy was 27/43 (63%) for ABLC and 15/39 (39%) for AmBisome (p=0.03). Median dose and duration of treatment was 10 days at 3 mg/kg for ABLC and 15 days at 4 mg/kg for AmBisome. Acute, not dose-limiting infusion side effects were seen in 70% vs. 36% (p=0.002), ABLC vs. AmBisome. Increase of bilirubin > 1.5 times from baseline was 38% vs. 59%, ABLC vs. AmBisome (p=0.05). ABLC and AmBisome were equally effective for the treatment of suspected or documented fungal infections. While, acute infusion-toxicity was greater with ABLC, infusion toxicity requiring discontinuation was similar for both drugs. AmBisome was better tolerated than ABLC but was associated with mild abnormalities in liver function tests at the end of therapy.

The past decade, it has become evident that circadian rhythms within metabolically active tissues are very important for physical health. However, although shift work has also been associated with an increased risk of fractures, circadian rhythmicityhas not yet been extensively studied in bone. Here, we investigated which genes are rhythmically expressed in bone, and whether circadian disruption by shifts in lightdark cycle affects bone turnover and structure in mice. Our results demonstrate diurnal expression patterns of clock genes (Rev-erbα, Bmal1, Per1, Per2, Cry1, Clock), as well as genes involved in osteoclastogenesis, osteoclast proliferation and function (Rankl, Opg, Ctsk), and osteocyte function (c-Fos) in bone. Weekly alternating lightdark cycles disrupted rhythmic clock gene expression in bone and caused a reduction in plasma levels of procollagen type 1 amino-terminal propeptide (P1NP) and tartrate-resistant acidic phosphatase (TRAP), suggestive of a reduced bone turnover.These effects coincided with an altered trabecular bone structure and increased cortical mineralization after 15 weeks of light-dark cycles, which may negatively affect

Ab initio quantum chemical computations have been done to determine the energetics and reaction pathways of hydroformylation of higher alkenes using a rhodium complex homogeneous catalyst. Calculation of fragments of the potential energy surfaces of the HRh(CO)(PPh3)3‐catalyzed hydroformylation of 1‐decene, 1‐dodecene, and styrene were performed by the restricted Hartree‐Fock method at the second‐order MØller‐Plesset (MP2) level of perturbation theory and basis set of 6‐31++G(d,p). Geometrically optimized structures of the intermediates and transition states were identified. Three generalized rate models were developed on the basis of above reaction path analysis as well as experimental findings reported in the literature. The kinetic and equilibrium parameters of the models were estimated by nonlinear least square regression of available literature data. The model based on H2‐oxidative addition fitted the data best; it predicts the conversion of all the alkenes quite satisfactorily with an average deviation of 7.6% and a maximum deviation of 13%. © 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2009

BackgroundImatinib mesylate can induce rapid tumor regression, increase tumor antigen presentation, and inhibit tumor immunosuppressive mechanisms. CTLA-4 blockade and imatinib synergize in mouse models to reduce tumor volume via intratumoral accumulation of CD8+ T cells. We hypothesized that imatinib combined with ipilimumab would be tolerable and may synergize in patients with advanced cancer.MethodsPrimary objective of the dose-escalation study (3 + 3 design) was to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose. Secondary objectives included evaluation of antitumor activity of the combination based on KIT mutation status and the capacity of tumor-associated immune biomarkers to predict response.ResultsThe primary objective to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was achieved, and the recommended phase II doses are ipilimumab at 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks and imatinib 400 mg twice daily. Of the 35 patients treated in the escalation and GIST expansion, none experienced dose-limiting toxicities. The most common grade 1/2–related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (66%), nausea (57%), anorexia, vomiting (each 31%), edema (29%), and anemia, diarrhea, and rash (each 23%). Grade 3 AEs occurred in 6 patients (17%) and included fatigue, anemia, fever, rash, and vomiting. There were no grade 4 AEs. In general, the combination was well tolerated. Among all patients, 2 responses were seen: 1 partial response (GIST) and 1 partial response (melanoma). Stable disease was seen in 6 patients lasting an average of 6 months. The melanoma responder was KIT mutated and the GIST responder was wild-type.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that this combination of a targeted agent with checkpoint blockade is safe across multiple tumor types. Low activity with no clear signal for synergy was observed in escalation or GIST expansion cohorts. Assessment of antitumor activity of this combination in the KIT-mutant melanoma population is being evaluated.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01738139, registered 28 November 2012.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40425-017-0238-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Purpose: As hypoxia can mediate resistance to immunotherapy, we investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combining evofosfamide, a prodrug that alleviates hypoxia, with ipilimumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, in immunologically “cold” cancers, which are intrinsically insensitive to immunotherapy, as well as in “hot/warm” metastatic cancers that are, atypical of such cancers, resistant to immunotherapy. Patients and Methods: In a phase I, 3+3 dose-escalation trial (NCT03098160), evofosfamide (400–640 mg/m2) and ipilimumab (3 mg/kg) were administered in four 3-week cycles. The former was administered on days 1 and 8 of cycles 1–2, while the latter was administered on day 8 of cycles 1–4. Response was assessed using immune-related RECIST and retreatment was allowed, if deemed beneficial, after completion of cycle 4 or at progression. Results: Twenty-two patients were enrolled, of whom 21 were evaluable, encompassing castration-resistant prostate cancer (n = 11), pancreatic cancer (n = 7), immunotherapy-resistant melanoma (n = 2), and human papillomavirus–negative head and neck cancer (n = 1). Drug-related hematologic toxicities, rash, fever, nausea, vomiting, and elevation of liver enzymes were observed in > 10% of patients. The most common drug-related grade 3 adverse event was alanine aminotransferase elevation (33.3%). Two patients discontinued ipilimumab and 4 required evofosfamide deescalation due to toxicity. Of 18 patients with measurable disease at baseline, 3 (16.7%) achieved partial response and 12 (66.7%) achieved stable disease. The best responses were observed at 560 mg/m2 evofosfamide. Preexisting immune gene signatures predicted response to therapy, while hypermetabolic tumors predicted progression. Responders also showed improved peripheral T-cell proliferation and increased intratumoral T-cell infiltration into hypoxia. Conclusions: No new or unexpected safety signals were observed from combining evofosfamide and ipilimumab, and evidence of therapeutic activity was noted.