Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common preventable and treatable disease, characterized by persistent airflow limitation that is usually progressive and associated with an enhanced chronic inflammatory response in the airways and the lung to noxious particles or gases. The major risk factor of COPD, which has been proven in many studies, is the exposure to cigarette smoke. However, it is 15–20% of all smokers who develop COPD. This is why we should recognize the pathobiology of COPD as involving a complex interaction between several factors, including genetic vulnerability. Oxidant-antioxidant imbalance is recognized as one of the significant factors in COPD pathogenesis. Numerous exogenous and endogenous sources of ROS are present in pathobiology of COPD. One of endogenous sources of ROS is mitochondria. Although leakage of electrons from electron transport chain and forming of ROS are the effect of physiological functioning of mitochondria, there are various intra- and extracellular factors which may increase this amount and significantly contribute to oxidative-antioxidative imbalance. With the coexistence with impaired antioxidant defence, all these issues lead to oxidative and carbonyl stress. Both of these states play a significant role in pathobiology of COPD and may account for development of major comorbidities of this disease.
COPD is associated with different comorbid diseases, and their frequency increases with age. Comorbidities severely impact costs of health care, intensity of symptoms, quality of life and, most importantly, may contribute to life span shortening. Some comorbidities are well acknowledged and established in doctors’ awareness. However, both everyday practice and literature searches provide evidence of other, less recognized diseases, which are frequently associated with COPD. We call them underrecognized comorbidities, and the reason why this is so may be related to their relatively low clinical significance, inefficient literature data, or data ambiguity. In this review, we describe rhinosinusitis, skin abnormalities, eye diseases, different endocrinological disorders, and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Possible links to COPD pathogenesis have been discussed, if the data were available.
Oxygen saturation telemonitoring would be successfully used in predicting ECOPD. Recording of day-to-day decrease in oxygen saturation >4% as alarming events would be effective approach which would be easily implemented in telemonitoring devices, however this outcome should be further validated in larger size samples.
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA, previously known as Wegener's granulomatosis) is a type of ANCA-associated vasculitis that affects small-to medium-sized vessels. GPA occurs with a prevalence of 24-152:1000000. The disease affects all races at every age. Various factors may have an impact on the etiology of GPA which is treated as an autoimmune disease. Genetic factors, infectious agents (like Staphylococcus aureus), environmental factors (like silica, hydrocarbons, fumes, pesticides, and farming) are considered elements for the development of the disease. Mostly, GPA affects the upper and lower respiratory tracts and kidneys and associated with otorhinolaryngological and renal manifestations. However, numerous untypical manifestations may also occur. Our review is aimed at discussing the most significant of them, including the neurological, cardiac, gastrointestinal tract, joints and muscles, skin, and ophthalmological manifestations. The whole literature was searched in PubMed. It has been used phrases granulomatosis with polyangiitis', Wegener's granulomatosis' and GPA'. The initial research for every sentence yielded subsequently, 4472, 5043, and 7110 results. Only studies with available full text were retrieved. After a threestage evaluation including a language evaluation, a heading evaluation, and an abstract evaluation, we obtained 139 relevant papers on which our review is based. GPA is a huge challenge for contemporary diagnostics and medicine. Our review is aimed at demonstrating the multiplicity of untypical manifestations and proving that every doctor may come into contact with a patient with GPA.
INTRODUCTION A higher prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) has been noted among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), particularly in those with acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD). Due to a similar clinical presentation and the lack of highly specific laboratory tests, there is a common overuse of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA). The introduction of an additional, simple, and inexpensive diagnostic tool to help in the diagnosis of PE in patients with AECOPD would be of special interest for everyday clinical practice. OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of the monocyte to large platelet ratio (MLPR) as a diagnostic tool for PE in patients with AECOPD. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective evaluation of patients with AECOPD and suspicion of PE who underwent CTPA. The MLPR was investigated as a marker of thrombosis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analyses were preformed to measure the accuracy of the MLPR in comparison with CTPA results and to identify the cutoff value for the MLPR. RESULTS A total of 101 patients (56 men and 45 women; median age, 72 years; range, 37-94 years) were included in the study. The MLPR showed an excellent accuracy in comparison with CTPA results: the area under the ROC curve was 0.945 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.904-0.986). The MLPR was characterized by a good accuracy of qualitative test parameters, with high sensitivity (100%; 95% CI, 79.6-100) and specificity (85.7%; 95% CI, 75.9-92.6). CONCLUSIONS The MLPR measurement appears to be a reliable, simple, inexpensive, and widely available test that may help in the differential diagnosis of PE in patients with AECOPD.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.