Early prediction of coronary artery disease complications is vital for the prevention and effective treatment of patients with coronary cardiac disease. It has been reported that inflammatory markers play a key role in the progression of cardiovascular diseases. Platelet count and platelet morphological parameters were analyzed on a fully-automated hematological analyzer ADVIA 2120 (Siemens). Serum myeloperoxidase (MPO) level was determined with an enzyme immunoassay (BioCheck). The measuring range of this assay is between 0 and 40 ng/ml. We demonstrate that serum MPO concentration and platelet activation increase systematically with the advancement of coronary artery disease. Moreover, MPO level is significantly higher in patients with unstable coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction compared with healthy subjects and patients with stable angina. The diagnostic sensitivity of these parameters was higher than of TnI (cardiac troponin I), CK-MB (creatine kinase-heart type), CRP (C-reactive protein), and fibrinogen and DD (D-dimers). MPO, L-PLT (large platelet), MPV (mean platelet volume), and MPC (mean platelet component concentration) may serve as attractive diagnostic and prognostic markers in the assessment of the risk for unstable atheroma in the course of coronary artery disease.
The study objective was to analyse the utility of laboratory tests performed in 30 patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL) at different clinical stages. Laboratory tests included automated and microscopic assessment of peripheral blood and bone marrow counts as well as evaluation of leukaemic cells. Apart from the diagnostic and prognostic value of laboratory abnormalities such as clonal lymphocytosis with CD5+CD19+CD23+ phenotype, reduced erythrocyte parameters, thrombocytopenia or bone marrow infiltration by the neoplastic clone as well as low percentage of Gumprecht's shadows, low apoptotic activity of peripheral blood lymphocytes, and increased percentage of CD38- and ZAP-70 ± cells markedly correlate with the stage of disease progression. These results seem to confirm the diagnostic and prognostic significance of these parameters determined in routine laboratory tests in B-CLL patients.
Background: The pathogenesis of hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients is complex and not fully understood. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) is a viscoelastic method that allows the definition of a patient’s hemostatic profile. This study aimed to assess the relationship between ROTEM® parameters, the profile of inflammatory cytokines, and clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Methods: A total of 63 participants (n = 29 symptomatic non-ICU COVID-19 patients, and n = 34 healthy controls) were prospectively included in the study. We assessed the relationship between the parameters of three ROTEM® tests (NATEM®, EXTEM®, and FIBTEM®) and levels of CRP, interleukin-8, interleukin-1β, interleukin-6, interleukin-10, tumor necrosis factor, interleukin 12p70, and clinical outcomes. Results: ROTEM® indicated hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients in all the tests performed. The levels of all inflammatory cytokines were significantly higher in COVID-19 patients. NATEM more frequently detected hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients compared to EXTEM. The strongest correlations with inflammatory biomarkers and CT severity score were with FIBTEM parameters. The elevated maximum clot elasticity (MCE) in FIBTEM was the strongest predictor of poor outcomes. Conclusions: Increased FIBTEM MCE may be associated with greater severity of COVID-19. Non-activated ROTEM (NATEM test) seems to be more valuable for detecting hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients compared to the tissue factor activated test (EXTEM).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.