We have developed a series of in vitro models with which to evaluate the biological activity of estrogen receptor (ER) agonists and antagonists. Using a protease digestion assay we show that the conformational changes induced within ER are distinct for agonists and antagonists. However, this assay is unable to discriminate between pure antagonists like ICI164,384 and partial agonists such as 4-OH tamoxifen or keoxifene. Using a chimeric ER-VP16 construct, we demonstrate that both pure antagonists and partial agonists deliver ER to its DNA target within cells. However, the ability of the DNA-bound receptor to activate transcription in the presence of a given antagonist is dependent on cell and promoter context. These data, suggesting functional differences among ER antagonists, were confirmed by additional experiments demonstrating that their ability to modulate the transcriptional activity of a series of ER mutants is dramatically different. Depending on the cell and promoter context and the particular ER form expressed, 4-OH tamoxifen and the related compound, keoxifene, functioned as partial agonists. Importantly, the transcriptional profiles of these two compounds were dissimilar, suggesting that they are functionally different from each other and from ICI164,384, which does not display agonist activity under any context examined. Our results reveal functional differences between these clinically important antiestrogens and suggest that the distinct biologies manifest by these compounds in vivo relate to their ability to differentially regulate ER function.

Estrogen receptor a (ERa) is a ligand-inducible transcription factor that acts to regulate gene expression by binding to palindromic DNA sequence, known as the estrogen response element, in promoters of estrogen-regulated genes. In breast cancer ERa plays a central role, where estrogen-regulated gene expression leads to tumor initiation, growth and survival. As an approach to silencing estrogenregulated genes, we have studied the activities of a fusion protein between ERa and the promyelocytic leukemia zincfinger (PLZF) protein, a transcriptional repressor that acts through chromatin remodeling. To do this, we have developed lines from the estrogen-responsive MCF-7 breast cancer cell line in which the expression of the fusion protein PLZF-ERa is conditionally regulated by tetracycline and shows that these feature long-term silencing of the expression of several well-characterized estrogen-regulated genes, namely pS2, cathepsin-D and the progesterone receptor. However, the estrogen-regulated growth of these cells is not inhibited unless PLZF-ERa expression is induced, an observation that we have confirmed both in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, these results show that PLZF-ERa is a potent repressor of estrogen-regulated gene expression and could be useful in distinguishing estrogen-regulated genes required for the growth of breast cancer cells. Gene Therapy (2005) 12, 452-460.

The androgen receptor (AR) is a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-activated transcription factors and plays a key role in the development and progression of prostate cancer. Current therapies include the use of antiandrogens aimed at inhibiting the transcriptional activation of AR-regulated genes by AR. Here, we explore a strategy aimed at obtaining silencing of ARregulated genes, based on the properties of the transcriptional repressor promyelocytic leukamia zinc-finger protein (PLZF). In order to do this, we have made a fusion protein between PLZF and AR, named PLZF-AR, and show that PLZF-AR is able to bring about silencing of genomically encoded AR-regulated genes and inhibit the androgen-regulated growth of LNCaP prostate cancer cells. Together, our results show that this strategy is able to bring about potent repression of AR-regulated responses and, therefore, could be of value in the development of new therapies for prostate cancer.

No abstract

No abstract