The success of alarm treatment is dependent on the child's ability to be aroused by the alarm. Interestingly, of those who successfully became dry, 72.2% slept throughout the night for >80% of nights that they were dry, suggesting that the mode of action of the enuresis alarm is more complex than was previously thought.

This paper is a review of outcome definitions and criteria for nocturnal enuresis treatment. A search of the literature published between 1991 and 2001 highlighted 97 papers. Although the International Children's Continence Society and the World Health Organization have published outcome criteria, different, often idiosyncratic, outcome criteria and/or definitions have been adopted in published research on treatment for nocturnal enuresis in recent years. There remains a debate as to what constitutes successful treatment and how to document improvement. Lack of an agreed definition of outcome reduces confidence in comparing studies, with serious clinical and research implications. This paper reviews aspects of importance in determining outcome, including a suggestion to focus on the establishment of dry nights rather than the reduction of wet nights. A new set of criteria is suggested, consisting of a banding system referred to as a "dryness scale", which focuses on the percentage of dry nights accomplished at a point in time, thus eliminating the need to compare current levels of dryness with a baseline.

The structured withdrawal program significantly reduces relapse rates, and offers an alternative and rapid means of successfully withdrawing medication. It is argued that the influential variable concerns the ability of the child to shift attribution for success from an external source (that is medication) to an internal focus (that is changes in themselves).

The structured withdrawal program significantly reduces relapse rates, and offers an alternative and rapid means of successfully withdrawing medication. It is argued that the influential variable concerns the ability of the child to shift attribution for success from an external source (that is medication) to an internal focus (that is changes in themselves).

This study endorses the three systems approach in clinical practice.