Abstract.A GRASP algorithm is presented for solving a sequencing problem in a mixed-model assembly line. The problem is focused on obtaining a manufacturing sequence that completes the greatest possible amount of required work and fulfils the production regularity property. The implemented GRASP algorithm is compared with other resolution procedures by means of instances from a case study linked to the Nissan's engine plant in Barcelona.Keywords: GRASP; Sequencing; Mixed-model assembly line; Production mix preservation. PreliminaresA mixed-model assembly line is able to manufacture several variants of the same product (e.g. engines for SUVs (Sport Utility Vehicle) and different types of vans) without physical changes at workstations and without significant setup times between consecutive different units. This type of assembly lines presents two categories of problems that are solved traditionally sequentially: (1) balancing problems [1], and (2) product sequencing problems [2]. The first problem type consists of assigning a set of tasks (relating to the product assembly) into a set of workstations arranged in series with the maximum efficiency as possible and fulfilling a set of conditions. Once solved the first problem and given a demand plan and the time to perform the said plan, the second type of problems consists of establishing the manufacturing order of products regarding one or more criteria. The objectives taken into account when the units are sequenced are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Indeed these objectives often respond to several concerns about production [3]. Among them, there are: (o.1) maximise the useless time, completing the maximum number of units and therefore reducing the unnecessary waitings [4]; (o.2) maximise the level of satisfaction of the set of constraints, which are related with spatial components of the products [5]; and (o.3) maintain constant the manufacturing rate of products and the component consumption rate in order to minimise the maximum levels of component stocks [6].
This work examines a balancing problem wherein the objective is to minimize both the ergonomic risk dispersion between the set of workstations of a mixed-model assembly line and the risk level of the workstation with the greatest ergonomic factor. A greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (GRASP) procedure is proposed to achieve these two objectives simultaneously. This new procedure is compared against two mixed integer linear programs: the MILP-1 model that minimizes the maximum ergonomic risk of the assembly line and the MILP-2 model that minimizes the average deviation from ergonomic risks of the set of workstations on the line. The results from the case study based on the automotive sector indicate that the proposed GRASP procedure is a very competitive and promising tool for further research.
One of the major issues in industrial environments is currently maximizing productivity while reducing manufacturing cost. This can be seen clearly reflected in mixed-model assembly lines based systems, where obtaining efficient manufacturing sequences is a key to be competitive in a dynamic and globalized market. However, this continuous cost reduction and productivity growth should not penalize the welfare of employees. This work is intended to address this lack of compatibility between the economic and social objectives through the study of the mixed-model sequencing problem from both the business and labor perspective. This is done by considering the possibility of reducing or increasing processing times of operations by varying the work pace of line's operators within the permissible legal boundaries. Thus, depending on this flexible activation time of operators, the amount of completed work and idle time will be one or the other and, consequently, the productivity of the line will also improve or get worse. In this regard, we propose new approach to the sequencing problem without incurring cost increases and providing a safe working environment, in accordance with applicable law. This new approach leads to obtain efficient manufacturing sequences, in terms of both productivity and labor conditions. Specifically, the objective of the new problem is minimizing the unproductive costs of the line by incorporating the possibility of increasing production through the variation of the work pace of line's operators. Increasing the work pace of operators, the amount of non-completed work or the preventable idle time can be reduced and therefore, their associated costs too. In addition, and without losing sight of the effort involved in working with a work pace above the normal, we propose several economic criteria to compensate the activation of workers where necessary.
The paper assumes that, at the end of the operational period of a Spanish nuclear power plant, an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation will be used for long-term storage. Spent fuel assemblies are selected and transferred to casks for dry storage, with a series of imposed restrictions (e.g., limiting the thermal load). In this context, we present a variant of the problem of spent nuclear fuel cask loading in one stage (i.e., the fuel is completely transferred from the spent fuel pool to the casks at once), offering a multi-start metaheuristic of three phases. (1) A mixed integer linear programming (MILP-1) model is used to minimize the cost of the casks required. (2) A deterministic algorithm (A1) assigns the spent fuel assemblies to a specific region of a specific cask based on an MILP-1 solution. (3) Starting from the A1 solutions, a local search algorithm (A2) minimizes the standard deviation of the thermal load among casks. Instances with 1200 fuel assemblies (and six intervals for the decay heat) are optimally solved by MILP-1 plus A1 in less than one second. Additionally, A2 gets a Pearson’s coefficient of variation lower than 0.75% in less than 260s CPU (1000 iterations).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.