Objectives: To assess the cohort of patients undergoing sialendoscopic intervention for improvement of symptoms and gland-related quality of life at long-term follow-up.
Objectives: To assess the cohort of patients undergoing sialendoscopic
intervention for improvement of symptoms and gland-related quality of
life at long-term follow up. Design: retrospective review of medical
records with a prospective follow-up by questionnaire. Methods: All
patients undergoing sialendoscopy between March 2008 and June 2020 were
analyzed in detail regarding indications, technical aspects and
postoperative course. To maximize follow-up, patients also received a
questionnaire by e-mail. Results: 272 sialendoscopies were performed in
221 patients. Median follow-up time was 37 months. The sialendoscopies
were performed in 130 patients for lithiasis, in 66 for stenosis, in 14
for recurrent parotitis of childhood, in 8 for recurrent sialadenitis of
unknown origin and in 3 for radio-iodine induced sialadenitis.
Complications occurred in 11 of 272 sialendoscopies (4%). Those were
iatrogenic perforations, temporary lingual nerve paresthesia and
swelling of the floor of the mouth. 53% of patients returned the
questionnaire, for a total of 146 evaluable sialendoscopies. The
majority of the responders indicated that sialendoscopy had improved
their symptoms (83.6%). Salivary glands could be preserved in 89% of
the responder group. The highest percentage of patients reporting
residual symptoms was found in the RPC group (81.3%) and the lowest in
the lithiasis group (16.2%). Besides age, no statistical differences in
demographic and pathological features between the responder and
non-responder groups were found, supporting generalization of the
responders’ results to the entire cohort. Conclusions: This study
confirms the good long-term outcomes of sialendoscopic interventions in
patients with chronic sialadenitis of different etiologies and a high
rate of gland preservation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.