The remarkable antiquity, diversity and ecological significance of arthropods have inspired numerous attempts to resolve their deep phylogenetic history, but the results of two decades of intensive molecular phylogenetics have been mixed. The discovery that terrestrial insects (Hexapoda) are more closely related to aquatic Crustacea than to the terrestrial centipedes and millipedes (Myriapoda) was an early, if exceptional, success. More typically, analyses based on limited samples of taxa and genes have generated results that are inconsistent, weakly supported and highly sensitive to analytical conditions. Here we present strongly supported results from likelihood, Bayesian and parsimony analyses of over 41 kilobases of aligned DNA sequence from 62 single-copy nuclear protein-coding genes from 75 arthropod species. These species represent every major arthropod lineage, plus five species of tardigrades and onychophorans as outgroups. Our results strongly support Pancrustacea (Hexapoda plus Crustacea) but also strongly favour the traditional morphology-based Mandibulata (Myriapoda plus Pancrustacea) over the molecule-based Paradoxopoda (Myriapoda plus Chelicerata). In addition to Hexapoda, Pancrustacea includes three major extant lineages of 'crustaceans', each spanning a significant range of morphological disparity. These are Oligostraca (ostracods, mystacocarids, branchiurans and pentastomids), Vericrustacea (malacostracans, thecostracans, copepods and branchiopods) and Xenocarida (cephalocarids and remipedes). Finally, within Pancrustacea we identify Xenocarida as the long-sought sister group to the Hexapoda, a result confirming that 'crustaceans' are not monophyletic. These results provide a statistically well-supported phylogenetic framework for the largest animal phylum and represent a step towards ending the often-heated, century-long debate on arthropod relationships.

This study attempts to resolve relationships among and within the four basal arthropod lineages (Pancrustacea, Myriapoda, Euchelicerata, Pycnogonida) and to assess the widespread expectation that remaining phylogenetic problems will yield to increasing amounts of sequence data. Sixty-eight regions of 62 protein-coding nuclear genes (approximately 41 kilobases (kb)/taxon) were sequenced for 12 taxonomically diverse arthropod taxa and a tardigrade outgroup. Parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian analyses of total nucleotide data generally strongly supported the monophyly of each of the basal lineages represented by more than one species. Other relationships within the Arthropoda were also supported, with support levels depending on method of analysis and inclusion/exclusion of synonymous changes. Removing third codon positions, where the assumption of base compositional homogeneity was rejected, altered the results. Removing the final class of synonymous mutations--first codon positions encoding leucine and arginine, which were also compositionally heterogeneous--yielded a data set that was consistent with a hypothesis of base compositional homogeneity. Furthermore, under such a data-exclusion regime, all 68 gene regions individually were consistent with base compositional homogeneity. Restricting likelihood analyses to nonsynonymous change recovered trees with strong support for the basal lineages but not for other groups that were variably supported with more inclusive data sets. In a further effort to increase phylogenetic signal, three types of data exploration were undertaken. (1) Individual genes were ranked by their average rate of nonsynonymous change, and three rate categories were assigned--fast, intermediate, and slow. Then, bootstrap analysis of each gene was performed separately to see which taxonomic groups received strong support. Five taxonomic groups were strongly supported independently by two or more genes, and these genes mostly belonged to the slow or intermediate categories, whereas groups supported only by a single gene region tended to be from genes of the fast category, arguing that fast genes provide a less consistent signal. (2) A sensitivity analysis was performed in which increasing numbers of genes were excluded, beginning with the fastest. The number of strongly supported nodes increased up to a point and then decreased slightly. Recovery of Hexapoda required removal of fast genes. Support for Mandibulata (Pancrustacea + Myriapoda) also increased, at times to "strong" levels, with removal of the fastest genes. (3) Concordance selection was evaluated by clustering genes according to their ability to recover Pancrustacea, Euchelicerata, or Myriapoda and analyzing the three clusters separately. All clusters of genes recovered the three concordance clades but were at times inconsistent in the relationships recovered among and within these clades, a result that indicates that the a priori concordance criteria may bias phylogenetic signal in unexpected ways. In a further attempt to increase su...

Lobsters are a ubiquitous and economically important group of decapod crustaceans that include the infraorders Polychelida, Glypheidea, Astacidea and Achelata. They include familiar forms such as the spiny, slipper, clawed lobsters and crayfish and unfamiliar forms such as the deep-sea and "living fossil" species. The high degree of morphological diversity among these infraorders has led to a dynamic classification and conflicting hypotheses of evolutionary relationships. In this study, we estimated phylogenetic relationships among the major groups of all lobster families and 94% of the genera using six genes (mitochondrial and nuclear) and 195 morphological characters across 173 species of lobsters for the most comprehensive sampling to date. Lobsters were recovered as a non-monophyletic assemblage in the combined (molecular + morphology) analysis. All families were monophyletic, with the exception of Cambaridae, and 7 of 79 genera were recovered as poly- or paraphyletic. A rich fossil history coupled with dense taxon coverage allowed us to estimate and compare divergence times and origins of major lineages using two drastically different approaches. Age priors were constructed and/or included based on fossil age information or fossil discovery, age, and extant species count data. Results from the two approaches were largely congruent across deep to shallow taxonomic divergences across major lineages. The origin of the first lobster-like decapod (Polychelida) was estimated in the Devonian (∼409-372 Ma) with all infraorders present in the Carboniferous (∼353-318 Ma). Fossil calibration subsampling studies examined the influence of sampling density (number of fossils) and placement (deep, middle, and shallow) on divergence time estimates. Results from our study suggest including at least 1 fossil per 10 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) in divergence dating analyses. [Dating; decapods; divergence; lobsters; molecular; morphology; phylogenetics.].

The taxonomic status, biogeographical distributions and existing collections are reviewed for all species of decapod crustaceans known from the vicinity of hydrothermal vents and cold (hydrocarbon or brine) seeps. To date, more than 125 species representing 33 families of decapods have been reported. Represented families are, in alphabetical order within infraorder, the penaeoid families Benthesicymidae and Sergestidae; the caridean families Alvinocarididae (all of which are vent or seep endemics), Crangonidae, Glyphocrangonidae, Hippolytidae, Nematocarcinidae, Oplophoridae, Palaemonidae, Pandalidae and Stylodactylidae; the anomuran families Chirostylidae, Galatheidae, Lithodidae and Parapaguridae; the brachyuran crab families Atelecyclidae, Bythograeidae (all of which are vent endemics), Cancridae, Epialtidae, Geryonidae, Goneplacidae, Homolidae, Majidae, Ocypodidae, Oregoniidae, Parthenopidae, Pisidae, Portunidae and Varunidae; the lobster (astacidean) family Nephropidae; and the thalassinidean families Axiidae, Callianassidae and Calocarididae. Some species appear to be vagrants, here defined as opportunistic species occasionally found in the vicinity of vent sites but not restricted to them. Other species, notably members of the shrimp family Alvinocarididae and the crab family Bythograeidae, are clearly endemics, known only from vent or seep sites and presumably restricted to them. All endemic vent shrimps, most of which were originally treated as members of the family Bresiliidae, are now treated as members of the family Alvinocarididae. The family Mirocarididae proposed earlier is no longer recognized following a recent review of the characters that define the genus Mirocaris and the family Alvinocarididae. Currently recognized vent-associated species of shrimp belong to six genera: Alvinocaris , Chorocaris , Mirocaris , Nautilocaris , Opaepele and Rimicaris ; the genus Iorania is no longer recognized. Several more genera and species are in various stages of description (manuscripts in press or in review). Of the endemic shrimp genera, only Alvinocaris has been reported from both hydrothermal vents and cold seeps. Vagrant shrimp species include members of the families Crangonidae (one species), Hippolytidae (several species in the genus Lebbeus ), Nematocarcinidae (genus Nematocarcinus , often seen but rarely collected), Oplophoridae (five genera), Palaemonidae (one species) and Pandalidae (one species of Chlorotocus questionably included).

The adult male of Cyclestheria hislopi, sole member of the spinicaudate conchostracan clam shrimp family Cyclestheriidae and a species of potential phylogenetic importance, is described for the first time. Several previously unknown features are revealed. Among these are (1) the morphology of the dorsal organ, which is roughly similar in shape to the supposedly homologous structure in other clam shrimps but bears a relatively large, centrally located pore unique to the species; (2) an anterior cuticular pore presumably leading to the ‘internal’ space surrounding the compound eyes, and thereby homologous to the same pore in other clam shrimps and in the Notostraca; (3) the spination and setation of the antennae and thoracopods, and (4) the mature male first thoracopods (claspers). The male claspers are paired and essentially equal in size and shape on right and left sides of the body. The second pair of thoracopods are not modified as claspers, a situation different from all other spinicaudate families but shared (plesiomorphic we propose) with the laevicaudatans and most cladocerans. The claspers bear a field of special spine‐like setae on the extremity of the ‘palm’; this setal type, previously unrecognized, is unique to Cyclestheria. The palm of the clasper also bears two palps (one very small), as in other conchostracan species (both laevicaudatans and spinicaudatans). The movable finger of the clasper, modified from the thoracopod endopod, bears a row of long setae along its outer extremity, also unique. Cyclestheria exhibits a mixture of characters, some unique and others typical of the Spinicaudata (Conchostraca). Cladoceran clasper types are briefly reviewed. as are the claspers in the Spinicaudata and Laevicaudata (Conchostraca). Morphology of the clasper of Cyclestheria shows typical spinicaudate characters. It is suggested that claspers on the first thoracopods may be a synapomorphy for the Conchostraca and the Cladocera. The possible role of Cyclestheria or a Cyclestheria‐like ancestor in cladoceran phylogeny is briefly discussed in light of recent suggestions (Martin and Cash‐Clark, 1995) of cladoceran monophyly and possible ancestral relationships with this genus. Some possibilities concerning the phylogenetic position of Cyclestheria–either as a sister group to the rest of the Spinicaudata or as a sister group to the Cladocera—are discussed.