JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. and dating, among other topics. From his review of the linguistic analyses of the over 90 pre-Incaic names on the list, he suggests that it represents a compilation of different traditions. He finds that most of the Montesinos kings were not Collas, but Waris. He hypothesizes that one of the three pre-Incaic dynasties represents the rulers of the Wari empire. The other two perhaps were contemporaneous dynasties flourishing during the Late Intermediate period. He accepts the king list as genuine and gives the dynasties names: Piruas, Amautas, and Tampu-Toccos, while all the while underscoring the propagandistic uses of history and acknowledging that the extant tradition that narrates the pre-Incaic kings and their deeds was probably manipulated.Among his conclusions (that are no doubt sure to provoke lively debate among some) is that the Incas ruled about 400 years, a longer period of hegemony than is currently accepted. He identifies them as the Hanan-Cuzcos: foreign, warring migrants from the Lake Titicaca region, raised to rulership by an usurper, Inca Roca. The Hurin Cuzcos, in contrast, were Aymara-speakers and the original inhabitants of the region. Finally, he summarizes his arguments, stating that "a notable part of the historical content of Fernando de Montesinos' chronicle seems to rest on more firm and reliable footing than has hitherto been thought."If his assertions prove true, archaeologists and ethnohistorians will have to rewrite most of the existing scholarship on pre-hispanic Andean history now in print. I suggest that his next contribution might be an authoritatively annotated edition of the work, so that the archaeologists, anthropologists, and historians who are eager to read or re-read the text will have him as a guide through its pages.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.