No abstract

ABSTRACT.Purpose: Angiogenesis in diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a multifactorial process regulated by hypoxia-induced growth factors and inflammatory cytokines. In addition to the angiogenic switch, the proteolytic processing and altered synthesis of the extracellular matrix are critical steps in this disease. This study was performed to evaluate the levels of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-2 and MMP-9), angiopoietin-1 and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-1 and Ang-2), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), erythropoietin (EPO) and transforming growth factor-b1 (totalTGFb1) in the vitreous of diabetic eyes undergoing vitrectomy compared with control eyes operated because of macular hole or pucker. Methods: Prospective consecutive controlled observational study performed in the unit of vitreoretinal surgery in Finland during the years 2006-2008. Vitreous samples were collected before the start of the conventional 3-ppp vitrectomy. Vitreous MMP-2 and MMP-9, Ang-1 and Ang-2, VEGF, EPO and TGFb1 concentrations were measured from 69 patients with Type 1 or 2 diabetes and 40 controls. Results: Comparison of eyes with DR with controls revealed that the mean vitreous concentrations of proMMP-2 (p = 0.0015), totalMMP-2 (p = 0.0011), proMMP-9 (p = 0.00001), total-MMP-9 (p < 0.00001), Ang-2 (p < 0.00001), VEGF (p < 0.00001), EPO (p < 0.00001) and totalTGFb1 (p = 0.000026) were significantly higher in the former group. A multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested intravitreal Ang-2 concentration being the key marker of PDR (p = 0.00025) (OR = 1507.9). Conclusion: The main new finding is that the intravitreal concentrations of Ang-2 correlated significantly with MMP-9, VEGF, EPO and TGFb1 levels in diabetic eyes undergoing vitrectomy. Thus, these factors could promote retinal angiogenesis synergistically.Key words: angiogenesis -angiopoietin-1 -angiopoietin-2 -diabetic retinopathy -erythropoietin -matrix metalloproteinases -proliferative diabetic retinopathy -proliferative diabetic vitreoretinopathy -traction retinal detachment -transforming growth factor-b1 -vascular endothelial growth factor -vitrectomy Acta Ophthalmol. 2013: 91: 531-539

ABSTRACT.Purpose: Tafluprost is a new prostaglandin F 2a (PGF 2a ) derivative in development for the treatment of glaucoma. Tafluprost is the first PGF 2a analogue with a preservative-free formulation. Methods: This randomized, investigator-masked, multicentre, crossover phase III study evaluated the pharmacodynamics and safety of preserved and preservative-free tafluprost 0.0015% eyedrops administered for 4 weeks in 43 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The primary variable was change from baseline in overall diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) at 4 weeks. Adverse events and other safety parameters were also analysed. Results: Decreased IOP was clearly observed with both formulations at week 1 and was sustained until week 4. The overall treatment difference (preservative-free versus preserved formulations) at week 4 was 0.01 mmHg (95% confidence interval ) 0.46 to 0.49; p = 0.96). There were no unexpected safety-related findings. Both formulations were well tolerated and most adverse events were ocular and mild in severity. Conclusions: The reduction in IOP achieved by preservative-free tafluprost is equivalent to that obtained with the preserved formulation. The preservativefree formulation was generally well tolerated.

IntroductionThe efficacy, safety and tolerability of the preservative-free (PF) fixed combination (FC) of tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% (once daily) were compared to those of the individual components (PF tafluprost 0.0015% once daily and PF timolol 0.5% twice daily) in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension inadequately controlled on prior timolol or prostaglandin monotherapy for 6 months.MethodsA stratified, double-masked, randomized, multicenter phase III study was conducted. A total of 189 prior timolol users were randomized within the timolol stratum (TS) to receive either FC (n = 95) or timolol 0.5% (TIM; n = 94). Furthermore, a total of 375 prior prostaglandin analog (PGA) users were randomized within the prostaglandin stratum (PS) to receive either FC (n = 188) or tafluprost 0.0015% (TAF; n = 187). To be eligible for participation in the study, the patients were required to have an intraocular pressure (IOP) of ≥22 mmHg when on timolol (TIM) or of ≥20 mmHg when on PGA in either treated eye at the screening and end-of-run-in visits. In addition to these, the study included visits at baseline, 2 and 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months and at a post-study visit. IOP was measured at 8 a.m., 10 a.m., 4 p.m., and 8 p.m.ResultsIn the TS, a significant reduction from baseline IOP was seen with FC and TIM throughout the study. Average diurnal IOP change from baseline at month 3 was −8.55 mmHg (32%) for FC and −7.35 mmHg (28%) for TIM. The model-based treatment difference (FC–TIM) was −0.885 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) −1.745 to −0.024; p = 0.044] demonstrating the superiority of FC over TIM. In the PS, a significant reduction in IOP was seen with both FC and TAF throughout the study. The average diurnal IOP change from baseline at month 3 was −8.61 mmHg (33%) for FC and −7.23 mmHg (28%) for TAF. The model-based treatment difference (FC–TAF) was −1.516 mmHg (95% CI −2.044 to −0.988; p < 0.001) demonstrating the superiority of FC over TAF. In the TS, related ocular adverse events (AEs) were more frequent for patients treated with FC compared to TIM (16.8% versus 6.4%), whereas related non-ocular AEs were more frequent with TIM compared to FC (2.1% versus 0.0%). In the PS, AEs were similarly distributed between FC and TAF. The frequency of conjunctival hyperemia of FC was low (6.4%).ConclusionThe preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost and timolol provided a substantial and significant IOP reduction in both strata. The IOP reduction was superior to both tafluprost 0.0015% and timolol 0.5% when given as monotherapies. Overall, the study treatments were safe and well tolerated.FundingSanten Oy, Tampere, Finland.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s12325-014-0163-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.