ABSTRACT. Diabetic eye disease remains a major cause of blindness in the world. Laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema became available more than two decades ago. The outcome of treatment depends on the timing of laser treatment. The laser treatment is optimally delivered when high-risk characteristics have developed in proliferative retinopathy or diabetic macular edema and before this has significantly affected vision. Laser treatment is usually successful if applied during this optimal period whereas the treatment benefit falls sharply if the treatment is applied too late. In order to optimize the timing of laser treatment in diabetic eye disease screening programs have been established. The oldest screening program is 20 years old and several programs have been established during the last decade. In this paper the organisation and methods of screening programs are described including direct and photographic screening. The incidence and prevalence of blindness is much lower in populations where screening for diabetic eye disease has been established compared to diabetic populations without screening. Technical advantages may allow increased efficiency and telescreening. From a public health standpoint screening for diabetic eye disease is one of the most cost effective health procedures available. Diabetic eye disease can be prevented using existing technology and the cost involved is many times less than the cost of diabetic blindness.

Aims/background-Retinal vessel dilatation is a well known phenomenon in diabetes. In this study, the theory of whether excessive changes in diameter and length of retinal vessels occur in the development of diabetic macular oedema was tested, supporting a hypothesis that the development of diabetic macular oedema may be linked to hydrostatic pressure changes described in Starling's law. Methods-From fundus photographs of diabetic patients attending a regular eye screening programme, the diameter and segment length of retinal vessels were measured in three retinopathy groups (12 patients each) with diabetic macular oedema (DMO), background retinopathy and no retinopathy, over a period of approximately 4 years, ending at the time of diagnosis of diabetic macular oedema in the DMO group. Results-A statistically significant dilatation and elongation of retinal arterioles, venules, and their macular branches was found before the diagnosis of macular oedema in the DMO group. No significant changes were found in the other two groups. Conclusion-It is suggested that Starling's law applies to the formation of oedema in the retina as in other tissues. (Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:274-278)

We evaluated a possible therapeutic effect of Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) on glaucoma patients that may benefit from improvements in ocular blood flow. A Phase I cross-over trial of GBE with placebo control in 11 healthy volunteers (8 women, 3 men: Age; 34 +/- 3 years, mean +/- SE) was performed. Patients were treated with either GBE 40 mg or placebo three times daily orally, for 2 days. Color Doppler imaging (Siemens Quantum 2000) was used to measure ocular blood flow before and after treatment. There was a two week washout period between GBE and placebo treatment. Ginkgo biloba extract significantly increased end diastolic velocity (EDV) in the ophthalmic artery (OA) (baseline vs GBE-treatment; 6.5 +/- 0.5 vs 7.7 +/- 0.5 cm/sec, 23% change, p=0.023), with no change seen in placebo (baseline vs GBE-treatment; 7.2 +/- 0.6 vs 7.1 +/- 0.5 cm/sec, 3% change, p=0.892). No side effects related to GBE were found. Ginkgo biloba extract did not alter arterial blood pressure, heart rate, or IOP. Ginkgo biloba extract significantly increased EDV in the OA and deserves further investigation in ocular blood flow and neuroprotection for possible application to the treatment of glaucomatous optic neuropathy as well as other ischemic ocular diseases.

No abstract

A screening program for diabetic eye disease was established in Iceland in 1980. Diabetics involved in the screening program have a low prevalence of blindness, 1% in type 1 and 1.6% in type 2. We examined ways to make the screening program more efficient by identifying subgroups at low risk of developing eye disease that require treatment and therefore need less frequent screening. We studied whether diabetic eye disease screening programs may be trimmed by excluding children and examining diabetics without retinopathy biannually. Our results indicate that diabetic children under the age of 12 years do not need regular screening for eye disease. Biannual examinations seem to suffice in type 1 and 2 diabetic patients without retinopathy. However, in a setting where the eye clinic is located apart from the diabetes clinics, biannual examinations present practical problems which could result in a less effective screening for diabetic eye disease.