Formative assessment is considered to be helpful in students' learning support and teaching design. Following Aufschnaiter's and Alonzo's framework, formative assessment practices of teachers can be subdivided into three practices: eliciting evidence, interpreting evidence and responding. Since students' conceptions are judged to be important for meaningful learning across disciplines, teachers are required to assess their students' conceptions. The focus of this article lies on the discussion of learning analytics for supporting the assessment of students' conceptions in class. The existing and potential contributions of learning analytics are discussed related to the named formative assessment framework in order to enhance the teachers' options to consider individual students' conceptions. We refer to findings from biology and computer science education on existing assessment tools and identify limitations and potentials with respect to the assessment of students' conceptions.
Online dialogue has tremendous potential to influence intergroup relations in conflict-ridden societies. Although prior research has identified intergroup harmony and justice as two distinct approaches to intergroup contact, little is known about whether online dialogue would foster a harmony-or justiceoriented discourse around conflict. To examine this question, the present study implemented a pre-post within-subjects design around a 4-week online dialogue intervention with Bosniaks and Serbs in the postconflict context of former Yugoslavia. Analyses of pre-post surveys suggest that the dialogue may have fostered a justice-oriented discourse among both Bosniaks and Serbs, who showed greater group identification and demands for justice after the dialogue compared to before the dialogue. There was also lower support for the goal of improving relationships and higher prioritization of discussions of justice after the dialogue. Exploring the linguistic content of the dialogue during the 4-week intervention further revealed that expressions of anger and anxiety decreased, whereas time orientations toward the present increased over time, suggesting that the justice-focused dialogue was not necessarily accompanied by explicit hostility over past atrocities. These findings help inform future interventions in postconflict societies, especially the use of online platforms to shape the discourse of conflict.Editor's Note. Continue the conversation by submitting your comments and questions about this article to PeacePsychology.org/peaceconflict. (The Editor of PeacePsychology.org reserves the right to exclude material that fails to contribute to constructive discussion.)This article was published Online First June 24, 2019. HEMA PREYA SELVANATHAN is a PhD candidate in social psychology with a concentration in the psychology of peace and violence at the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences in the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Her research focuses on intergroup relations and social change.BERNHARD LEIDNER holds a PhD in cognitive, social, and developmental psychology from The New School for Social Research in New York. He is currently an Associate Professor in the Psychology of Peace and Violence Program, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. His research focuses on the processes of social identification and intergroup relations primarily in the context of large social categories such as nations and ethnic groups.NEBOJŠA PETROVIC ´holds a PhD in social psychology from the University of Belgrade. He is currently a full-time professor at the Department of Psychology in the University of Belgrade. He is a social psychologist whose research focuses on reconciliation, applying psychology for resolving social issues, political values, and social representations of history.NEDIM PRELIC ´graduated from the University of Tuzla, Faculty of Philosophy at the Pedagogy-Psychology Department. He holds a Master's degree in psychology and is currently an Associate Teaching...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.